Wang Qiong, Xia Wei, Zhao Zhigang, Zhang Huifeng
Department of Endocrinology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Weiwu Road No. 7, Zhengzhou 450003, China.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2015 Oct;9(5):362-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of low glycemic index (GI) through the comparison of low-GI foods group and high-GI foods group on glycemic control (the measurements were HbA1c and fructosamine) for patients with diabetes.
The studies were retrieved from databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Springer, Elsevier Science Direct, Cochrane Library and Google scholar from their inception to August 2014. Review Manager 5.1 and STATA package v.11.0 software were applied for the meta-analysis. Standard mean difference (SWD) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for HbA1c and fructosamine of patients with diabetes were collected and calculated in a fixed or random effects model when appropriate. Subgroup analysis stratified by study design, geographic area of participants and types of diabetes were also conducted.
There were significant differences of overall effects on HbA1c between low-GI foods group and high-GI foods group (SWD=-0.42, 95%CI=-0.69 to -0.16, P<0.01) in patients with diabetes, and the subgroup analysis indicated that significant differences of HbA1c were also found between the two groups in crossover study, in Australian population and American population, as well as in type 2 diabetes. The overall fructosamine was also significantly different in patients with diabetes between low-GI foods and high-GI foods group (SMD=-0.44, 95%CI=-0.82 to -0.06, P=0.02).
Our results suggest that low-GI diets achieve a more beneficial effect on glycemic control than that of high-GI foods diets.
本研究旨在通过比较低血糖指数(GI)食物组和高GI食物组对糖尿病患者血糖控制(测量指标为糖化血红蛋白和果糖胺)的影响来评估低GI的作用。
从包括PubMed、MEDLINE、Springer、爱思唯尔科学Direct、考克兰图书馆和谷歌学术在内的数据库中检索自创建至2014年8月的研究。应用Review Manager 5.1和STATA软件包v.11.0进行荟萃分析。收集并在适当情况下采用固定效应模型或随机效应模型计算糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白和果糖胺的标准均数差(SMD)及其相应的95%置信区间(CI)。还按研究设计、参与者地理区域和糖尿病类型进行了亚组分析。
糖尿病患者中,低GI食物组和高GI食物组在糖化血红蛋白总体效应上存在显著差异(SMD=-0.42,95%CI=-0.69至-0.16,P<0.01),亚组分析表明,在交叉研究、澳大利亚人群和美国人群以及2型糖尿病中,两组之间糖化血红蛋白也存在显著差异。糖尿病患者中,低GI食物组和高GI食物组的总体果糖胺也有显著差异(SMD=-0.44,95%CI=-0.82至-0.06,P=0.02)。
我们的结果表明,低GI饮食比高GI食物饮食在血糖控制方面具有更有益的效果。