British Heart Foundation National Centre for Physical Activity and Health, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;41(5):1460-71. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys118.
Research examining sedentary behaviour as a potentially independent risk factor for chronic disease morbidity and mortality has expanded rapidly in recent years.
We present a narrative overview of the sedentary behaviour measurement literature. Subjective and objective methods of measuring sedentary behaviour suitable for use in population-based research with children and adults are examined. The validity and reliability of each method is considered, gaps in the literature specific to each method identified and potential future directions discussed.
To date, subjective approaches to sedentary behaviour measurement, e.g. questionnaires, have focused predominantly on TV viewing or other screen-based behaviours. Typically, such measures demonstrate moderate reliability but slight to moderate validity. Accelerometry is increasingly being used for sedentary behaviour assessments; this approach overcomes some of the limitations of subjective methods, but detection of specific postures and postural changes by this method is somewhat limited. Instruments developed specifically for the assessment of body posture have demonstrated good reliability and validity in the limited research conducted to date. Miniaturization of monitoring devices, interoperability between measurement and communication technologies and advanced analytical approaches are potential avenues for future developments in this field.
High-quality measurement is essential in all elements of sedentary behaviour epidemiology, from determining associations with health outcomes to the development and evaluation of behaviour change interventions. Sedentary behaviour measurement remains relatively under-developed, although new instruments, both objective and subjective, show considerable promise and warrant further testing.
近年来,研究久坐行为是否是慢性病发病率和死亡率的一个潜在独立危险因素的研究迅速增多。
我们对久坐行为测量文献进行了叙述性综述。本文检查了适合在儿童和成人人群研究中使用的主观和客观的久坐行为测量方法。对每种方法的有效性和可靠性进行了评估,指出了每种方法特定的文献中的差距,并讨论了潜在的未来方向。
迄今为止,主观的久坐行为测量方法,例如问卷调查,主要集中在电视观看或其他基于屏幕的行为上。通常情况下,这些措施的可靠性中等,但有效性有些轻微到中等。加速度计越来越多地用于久坐行为评估;这种方法克服了主观方法的一些局限性,但该方法对特定姿势和姿势变化的检测有些局限。迄今为止,在有限的研究中,专门为评估身体姿势而开发的仪器显示出了良好的可靠性和有效性。监测设备的小型化、测量和通信技术之间的互操作性以及先进的分析方法是该领域未来发展的潜在途径。
在久坐行为流行病学的所有方面,从确定与健康结果的关联到行为改变干预措施的制定和评估,高质量的测量都是必不可少的。尽管新的仪器,包括主观和客观的,都显示出了很大的前景,并且值得进一步的测试,但久坐行为的测量仍然相对不发达。