Killen Melanie, Henning Alexandra, Kelly Megan Clark, Crystal David, Ruck Martin
University of Maryland.
Georgetown University.
Int J Behav Dev. 2007 Sep;31(5):491-500. doi: 10.1177/0165025407081478.
U.S. majority (European-American) and minority (African-American, Latin-American, Asian-American) students were interviewed regarding race-based and non-race based reasons for exclusion in interracial peer dyads ( = 685), evenly divided by gender at 4, 7, and 10 grades attending 20 public schools. All students judged race-based exclusion as the most wrong followed by non-raced based reasons such as lack of shared interests, parental discomfort, and peer pressure. Minority students were more likely to judge non-race based exclusion as wrong than were majority students, and were more likely to expect that racial exclusion occurs, indicating that ethnic background and social experience are significantly related to interpretations of interracial peer dyadic reasons for exclusion.
研究人员对美国的多数群体(欧美裔美国人)和少数群体(非裔美国人、拉丁裔美国人、亚裔美国人)学生进行了访谈,询问他们在跨种族同伴二元组(n = 685)中基于种族和非种族原因而被排斥的情况。这些学生来自20所公立学校,分布在4年级、7年级和10年级,且男女比例均衡。所有学生都认为基于种族的排斥是最错误的,其次是非种族原因,如缺乏共同兴趣、家长的不满和同伴压力。少数群体学生比多数群体学生更倾向于认为非种族排斥是错误的,并且更有可能预期会发生种族排斥,这表明种族背景和社会经历与对跨种族同伴二元组中排斥原因的理解显著相关。