• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在涉及社会包容的同伴群体背景下,优先考虑种族或财富。

Giving priority to race or wealth in peer group contexts involving social inclusion.

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park.

Department of Psychology, University of Rochester.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2021 May;57(5):651-661. doi: 10.1037/dev0001178.

DOI:10.1037/dev0001178
PMID:34166012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8238375/
Abstract

This study investigated children's and adolescents' predictions regarding intergroup inclusion in contexts where peers differed on two dimensions of group membership: race and wealth. African American and European American participants ( = 153; age range: 8-14 years, = 11.46 years) made predictions about whether afterschool clubs would prefer to include a peer based on race or wealth and reported what they personally thought should happen. Between late childhood and early adolescence, European American participants increasingly expected that afterschool clubs would include a same-wealth peer (even when this peer was of a different race) whereas African American participants increasingly expected that the afterschool clubs would include a same-race peer (even when this peer was of a different level of wealth). Both European American and African American participants themselves thought that the clubs should include a same-wealth peer over a same-race peer, and with age, were increasingly likely to reference perceived comfort when explaining their decision. Future studies on the development of racial preferences will benefit from including wealth status information given that, with age, perceived comfort was associated with same-wealth rather than same-race status. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究调查了儿童和青少年对群体包容的预测,这些群体在两个群体成员维度上存在差异:种族和财富。非裔美国人和欧洲裔美国人参与者(n = 153;年龄范围:8-14 岁,M = 11.46 岁)预测了课外俱乐部会根据种族还是财富来选择接纳一个同伴,并报告了他们个人认为应该发生的事情。从童年后期到青春期早期,欧洲裔美国参与者越来越期望课外俱乐部会接纳一个同财富的同伴(即使这个同伴是不同种族的),而非洲裔美国参与者越来越期望俱乐部会接纳一个同种族的同伴(即使这个同伴的财富水平不同)。欧洲裔美国和非洲裔美国参与者自己都认为俱乐部应该接纳一个同财富的同伴,而不是同种族的同伴,并且随着年龄的增长,他们在解释自己的决定时越来越倾向于提到感知到的舒适感。未来关于种族偏好发展的研究将受益于纳入财富状况信息,因为随着年龄的增长,感知到的舒适感与同财富相关,而不是与同种族相关。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Giving priority to race or wealth in peer group contexts involving social inclusion.在涉及社会包容的同伴群体背景下,优先考虑种族或财富。
Dev Psychol. 2021 May;57(5):651-661. doi: 10.1037/dev0001178.
2
Social inclusion and exclusion in same-race and interracial peer encounters.同种族和跨种族同伴交往中的社会包容和排斥。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Nov;55(11):2440-2450. doi: 10.1037/dev0000810. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
3
Children's and Adolescents' Evaluations of Intergroup Exclusion in Interracial and Interwealth Peer Contexts.儿童和青少年对种族间和贫富间同伴群体中群体排斥的评价。
Child Dev. 2020 Mar;91(2):e512-e527. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13249. Epub 2019 May 29.
4
"Honestly, they are just like us": U.S. parents choose middle-class gender and racial ingroup peers for their children.“说实话,他们和我们一样”:美国父母为孩子选择中产阶级的性别和种族内群体同伴。
Dev Psychol. 2024 Apr;60(4):637-648. doi: 10.1037/dev0001724. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
5
Peer support development among Black American and Latinx adolescents: The role of ethnic-racial centrality.美国黑人和拉丁裔青少年中的同伴支持发展:种族核心地位的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Dec;55(12):2637-2648. doi: 10.1037/dev0000829. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
6
Lebanese adolescents' expectations about social inclusion of peers in intergroup contexts.黎巴嫩青少年对跨群体背景下同伴社会包容的期望。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2021 Sep;39(3):424-441. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12372. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
7
Why do children show racial biases in their resource allocation decisions?为什么儿童在资源分配决策中表现出种族偏见?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Nov;211:105224. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105224. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
8
Children's social reasoning about inclusion and exclusion in gender and race peer group contexts.儿童在性别和种族同伴群体背景下关于包容与排斥的社会推理。
Child Dev. 2001 Jan-Feb;72(1):174-86. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00272.
9
Individual differences in race schematicity as predictors of African American and white children's race-relevant memories and peer preferences.种族图式化的个体差异作为非裔美国儿童和白人儿童与种族相关记忆及同伴偏好的预测因素。
J Genet Psychol. 2000 Dec;161(4):400-19. doi: 10.1080/00221320009596721.
10
Children's and adolescents' evaluations of wealth-related STEM inequality.儿童和青少年对与财富相关的STEM不平等的评估。
Soc Dev. 2024 Feb;33(1):e12710. doi: 10.1111/sode.12710. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's evaluations of interracial peer inclusion and exclusion: The role of intimacy.儿童对跨种族同伴接纳与排斥的评价:亲密关系的作用。
Child Dev. 2025 Mar-Apr;96(2):645-661. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14197. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
2
Making sense of conflicting messages of multiracial identity: a systematic review.解读多族裔身份的矛盾信息:一项系统综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 25;15:1307624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1307624. eCollection 2024.
3
Children's and adolescents' evaluations of wealth-related STEM inequality.儿童和青少年对与财富相关的STEM不平等的评估。

本文引用的文献

1
Social inclusion and exclusion in same-race and interracial peer encounters.同种族和跨种族同伴交往中的社会包容和排斥。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Nov;55(11):2440-2450. doi: 10.1037/dev0000810. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
2
Perceived access to resources and young children's fairness judgments.感知到的资源获取和幼儿的公平判断。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Dec;188:104667. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104667. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
3
The Development of Critical Consciousness and its Relation to Academic Achievement in Adolescents of Color.《有色人种青少年批判性意识的发展及其与学业成就的关系》。
Soc Dev. 2024 Feb;33(1):e12710. doi: 10.1111/sode.12710. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
4
White American Students' Recognition of Racial Microaggressions in Higher Education.美国白人学生对高等教育中种族微侵犯行为的认知。
J Divers High Educ. 2024 Feb;17(1):54-67. doi: 10.1037/dhe0000391. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
5
Adolescents view social exclusion based on social class as more wrong than do children.青少年比儿童更认为基于社会阶层的社会排斥是错误的。
Dev Psychol. 2023 Sep;59(9):1703-1715. doi: 10.1037/dev0001564. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
6
Challenging the Exclusion of Immigrant Peers.挑战对移民同龄人(或同伴)的排斥。
Int J Behav Dev. 2023 Jan;47(1):9-20. doi: 10.1177/01650254221128275. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
7
Developmental Perspectives on Social Inequalities and Human Rights.社会不平等与人权的发展视角
Hum Dev. 2022 Dec;66(4-5):329-342. doi: 10.1159/000526276. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
8
Group Norms Influence Children's Expectations About Status Based on Wealth and Popularity.群体规范影响儿童基于财富和受欢迎程度对地位的期望。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 11;13:816205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.816205. eCollection 2022.
9
Testing the effectiveness of the Developing Inclusive Youth program: A multisite randomized control trial.测试发展包容青年计划的效果:一项多地点随机对照试验。
Child Dev. 2022 May;93(3):732-750. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13785. Epub 2022 May 25.
10
Social and Racial Justice as Fundamental Goals for the Field of Human Development.社会和种族正义是人类发展领域的基本目标。
Hum Dev. 2021 Dec;65(5-6):257-269. doi: 10.1159/000519698. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
Child Dev. 2020 Mar;91(2):e451-e474. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13262. Epub 2019 May 29.
4
Commentary on economic inequality: "what" and "who" constitutes research on social inequality in developmental science?发展科学中社会不平等研究的“什么”和“谁”:经济不平等述评
Dev Psychol. 2019 Mar;55(3):586-591. doi: 10.1037/dev0000640.
5
Children's and adolescents' understanding and experiences of economic inequality: An introduction to the special section.儿童和青少年对经济不平等的理解和体验:特刊介绍。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Mar;55(3):449-456. doi: 10.1037/dev0000694.
6
Integrating an Intersectionality Lens in Theory and Research in Developmental Science.将交叉性视角融入发展科学的理论与研究中。
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2018 Sep;2018(161):7-15. doi: 10.1002/cad.20245. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
7
Adolescents' conceptions of national wealth distribution: Connections with perceived societal fairness and academic plans.青少年对国家财富分配的观念:与感知到的社会公平和学业计划的关联。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Mar;53(3):463-474. doi: 10.1037/dev0000263.
8
Children's evaluations of interethnic exclusion: The effects of ethnic boundaries, respondent ethnicity, and majority in-group bias.儿童对族裔间排斥的评价:族裔界限、受访者种族以及多数群体内群体偏见的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jun;158:46-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
9
Age-Related Changes in Children's Associations of Economic Resources and Race.儿童对经济资源与种族认知的年龄相关变化
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 16;7:884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00884. eCollection 2016.
10
Children's Racial Categorization in Context.情境中的儿童种族分类
Child Dev Perspect. 2016 Mar;10(1):33-38. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12155. Epub 2015 Nov 22.