Kluger Nicolas
Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venerology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Int J Dermatol. 2015 Jan;54(1):13-8. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12613.
The tattoo removal market has boomed over the years following the increased prevalence of tattooed individuals around the world. Surgery and laser are currently the gold standards for tattoo removal. However, both of them have drawbacks. Surgery is better suited for small tattoos in areas of adequate skin laxity but leave a scar, while laser removal is a long and painful procedure, with no guarantee of a complete efficacy. Both are expensive procedures, and not all individuals are ready to fund them privately. Consequently, some individuals are in the search of faster, easier, and cheaper procedures that can be performed either by themselves or by laypeople. The unregulated market of internet provides a favorable ground for many websites to offer various tattoo removal methods. Besides, some tattooists and other non-medical laypeople have started to get interested by such a growing market, especially as some laser devices manufactured in Asia are now available at competitive prices, and due to weaknesses in the EU legislation regarding the use of lasers for cosmetic procedures by non-medical laypeople. We review here different do-it-yourself and over-the-counter tattoo removal methods. We discuss the potential risks for tattooed individuals and stress the importance of a better regulation of such a market.
近年来,随着全球纹身人群的增多,纹身去除市场蓬勃发展。手术和激光目前是纹身去除的金标准。然而,它们都有缺点。手术更适合于皮肤松弛度足够的部位的小纹身,但会留下疤痕,而激光去除是一个漫长且痛苦的过程,且不能保证完全有效。这两种方法都费用高昂,并非所有人都愿意自费。因此,一些人在寻找可以自己或由外行人员操作的更快、更简便且更便宜的方法。互联网的无监管市场为许多网站提供了有利条件,它们提供各种纹身去除方法。此外,一些纹身师和其他非医学外行人员开始对这个不断增长的市场感兴趣,特别是因为现在一些亚洲制造的激光设备价格具有竞争力,并且由于欧盟在非医学外行人员使用激光进行美容手术方面的立法存在漏洞。我们在此回顾不同的自行操作和非处方纹身去除方法。我们讨论纹身人群面临的潜在风险,并强调更好地监管这个市场的重要性。