Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
California Adolescent Health Collaborative, Public Health Institute, Oakland, California;
Pediatrics. 2015 Jan;135(1):76-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2471. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
Few evidence-based interventions address adolescent relationship abuse in clinical settings. This cluster randomized controlled trial tested the effectiveness of a brief relationship abuse education and counseling intervention in school health centers (SHCs).
In 2012-2013, 11 SHCs (10 clusters) were randomized to intervention (SHC providers received training to implement) or standard-of-care control condition. Among 1062 eligible students ages 14 to 19 years at 8 SHCs who continued participation after randomization, 1011 completed computer-assisted surveys before a clinic visit; 939 completed surveys 3 months later (93% retention).
Intervention versus control adjusted mean differences (95% confidence interval) on changes in primary outcomes were not statistically significant: recognition of abuse = 0.10 (-0.02 to 0.22); intentions to intervene = 0.03 (-0.09 to 0.15); and knowledge of resources = 0.18 (-0.06 to 0.42). Intervention participants had improved recognition of sexual coercion compared with controls (adjusted mean difference = 0.10 [0.01 to 0.18]). In exploratory analyses adjusting for intensity of intervention uptake, intervention effects were significant for increased knowledge of relationship abuse resources and self-efficacy to use harm reduction behaviors. Among participants reporting relationship abuse at baseline, intervention participants were less likely to report such abuse at follow-up (mean risk difference = -0.17 [-0.21 to -0.12]). Adolescents in intervention clinics who reported ever being in an unhealthy relationship were more likely to report disclosing this during the SHC visit (adjusted odds ratio = 2.77 [1.29 to 5.95]).
This is the first evidence of the potential benefit of a SHC intervention to address abusive relationships among adolescents.
很少有循证干预措施能在临床环境中解决青少年恋爱关系虐待问题。本项整群随机对照试验检验了在学校健康中心(SHC)实施简短恋爱关系虐待教育和咨询干预的效果。
2012-2013 年,11 个 SHC(10 个群组)被随机分配至干预组(SHC 提供者接受实施培训)或标准护理对照组。在 8 个 SHC 中,共有 1062 名符合条件的 14 至 19 岁青少年在随机分组后继续参与,其中 1011 名在就诊前完成了计算机辅助调查;939 名在 3 个月后完成了调查(93%保留率)。
干预组与对照组在主要结局的变化上的调整均值差异(95%置信区间)无统计学意义:虐待识别=0.10(-0.02 至 0.22);干预意向=0.03(-0.09 至 0.15);资源知识=0.18(-0.06 至 0.42)。与对照组相比,干预组在性胁迫识别方面有改善(调整均值差异=0.10 [0.01 至 0.18])。在调整干预接受强度的探索性分析中,干预效果在增加恋爱关系虐待资源知识和使用减少伤害行为的自我效能方面显著。在基线报告恋爱关系虐待的参与者中,干预组在随访时报告此类虐待的可能性较低(平均风险差异=-0.17 [-0.21 至 -0.12])。在干预诊所报告曾处于不健康关系的青少年在 SHC 就诊时更有可能披露这一点(调整优势比=2.77 [1.29 至 5.95])。
这是第一项关于 SHC 干预措施在解决青少年恋爱关系虐待问题方面潜在益处的证据。