• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎。所谓的“黄金 72 小时”到底有多紧急?或者更好的是“黄金 24 小时”和“白银 25-72 小时”?一项病例对照研究。

Cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. How time-critical are the so called "golden 72 hours"? Or better "golden 24 hours" and "silver 25-72 hour"? A case control study.

机构信息

Helios Klinikum Wuppertal, Department of Surgery II, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusner Strasse 40, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany ; Department of General, visceral and thoracic surgery, St. Remigius Hospital Opladen, An St. Remigius 26, 51379 Leverkusen, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine, St. Elisabeth Hospital Hohenlind, 50377 Köln, Germany.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2014 Dec 16;9(1):60. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-60. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1186/1749-7922-9-60
PMID:25538792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4274710/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Early cholecystectomy within 72 hours has been shown to be superior to late or delayed cholecystectomy with regard to outcome and cost of treatment. Recently, immediate cholecystectomy within 24 hours of onset of symptom was proposed as standard procedure for the management of fit patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. We sort to find out if there are any differences in surgical outcomes between patients managed within 24 h and those managed 25-72 h following symptom begin for acute cholecystitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed. The outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 h were compared to those of patients managed 25-72 h following symptom onset for acute cholecystitis.

RESULTS

35 patients managed 25-72 h following begin of symptoms were matched with 35 patients with similar baseline features, medical comorbidities and disease severity managed within 24 hours of symptom onset. There were no significant differences in the duration of surgery, postoperative complications, rate of conversion and length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within 24 hour of symptom onset is not superior to surgery 25-72 hour after symptoms begin. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis therefore can be safely performed anytime within the golden 72 h.

摘要

简介

早期胆囊切除术在 72 小时内进行,在治疗结果和成本方面优于晚期或延迟胆囊切除术。最近,建议对有症状发作后 24 小时内的适合患者进行即刻胆囊切除术,作为急性胆囊炎的标准治疗方法。我们试图找出在急性胆囊炎症状发作后 24 小时内和 25-72 小时内接受治疗的患者之间手术结果是否存在差异。

患者和方法

进行了回顾性分析。比较了在症状发作后 24 小时内接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者的结果,与在症状发作后 25-72 小时接受治疗的患者的结果。

结果

35 例在症状开始后 25-72 小时接受治疗的患者与 35 例具有相似基线特征、合并症和疾病严重程度的患者进行了匹配,这些患者在症状发作后 24 小时内接受了手术。手术时间、术后并发症、转换率和住院时间无显著差异。

结论

急性胆囊炎在症状发作后 24 小时内进行即刻腹腔镜胆囊切除术并不优于症状开始后 25-72 小时进行手术。因此,急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术可以在黄金 72 小时内的任何时间安全进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3e/4274710/5bdd980eca02/13017_2014_393_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3e/4274710/5bdd980eca02/13017_2014_393_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3e/4274710/5bdd980eca02/13017_2014_393_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. How time-critical are the so called "golden 72 hours"? Or better "golden 24 hours" and "silver 25-72 hour"? A case control study.胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎。所谓的“黄金 72 小时”到底有多紧急?或者更好的是“黄金 24 小时”和“白银 25-72 小时”?一项病例对照研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2014 Dec 16;9(1):60. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-60. eCollection 2014.
2
Should acute cholecystitis be operated in the 24 h following symptom onset? A retrospective cohort study.急性胆囊炎症状发作后 24 小时内应行手术治疗吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Jan;25:88-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.049. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
3
Is it Safe to Perform Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculus Cholecystitis within 7 Days Following Symptom Onset?症状出现后7天内对急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术是否安全?
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2018 Nov-Dec;56(214):945-948. doi: 10.31729/jnma.3655.
4
Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术对比
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Oct;7(5):407-14.
5
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Minerva Chir. 2012 Oct;67(5):381-7.
6
Timing of cholecystectomy as the therapy for acute calculous cholecystitis.作为急性结石性胆囊炎治疗手段的胆囊切除术时机
Rozhl Chir. 2019 Winter;98(12):492-496. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2019.98.12.492-496.
7
Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with cholecystolithiasis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的时机
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Mar-Apr;51(56):346-8.
8
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Prospective non-randomized study].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎。前瞻性非随机研究]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2000 Apr;24(4):400-3.
9
Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines.急性胆囊炎患者的外科治疗:东京指南
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(1):91-7. doi: 10.1007/s00534-006-1161-x. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
10
Predictive factors for successful early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: a prospective study.急性胆囊炎早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术成功的预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Int J Surg. 2010;8(8):623-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.05.014. Epub 2010 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis. When Do Risks Seem Imminent?急性胆囊炎的早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术。何时风险似乎迫在眉睫?
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e70052. doi: 10.1111/ases.70052.
2
Comparative Analysis of Complications in Early Verses Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发症的比较分析
Cureus. 2025 Feb 14;17(2):e78985. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78985. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Efficacy of blood parameters as indicators of the need for overdue urgent cholecystectomy in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis.

本文引用的文献

1
No 72-hour pathological boundary for safe early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: a clinicopathological study.急性胆囊炎早期安全腹腔镜胆囊切除术不存在72小时病理界限:一项临床病理研究
Ann Gastroenterol. 2013;26(4):340-345.
2
Elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: our experience.老年人择期及急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术:我们的经验
BMC Surg. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S21. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
3
Acute cholecystitis: the golden 72-h period is not a strict limit to perform early cholecystectomy. Results from 316 consecutive patients.
血液参数作为老年急性胆囊炎患者行择期紧急胆囊切除术必要性的指标的疗效。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Oct 27;29(11):1248-1254. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.75670.
4
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis: A Secondary Center Experience.急性结石性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:二级中心经验
Cureus. 2023 Jun 28;15(6):e41114. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41114. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: should we operate beyond the first week?急性胆囊炎的早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术:我们应该在第一周之后进行手术吗?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 26;408(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02816-5.
6
Overlooked but Serious Gallbladder Disease during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Retrospective Analysis.体外膜肺氧合期间被忽视但严重的胆囊疾病:一项回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 14;11(8):2199. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082199.
7
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in oldest-old patients: a propensity score matched analysis of a nationwide registry.老年患者早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术:全国注册登记的倾向评分匹配分析。
Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):979-989. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01254-0. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
8
Diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis: a single-centre audit of guideline adherence and patient outcomes.急性胆囊炎的诊断和治疗:一项针对指南遵循情况和患者结局的单中心审计。
Can J Surg. 2020 May 8;63(3):E241-E249. doi: 10.1503/cjs.002719.
9
Delayed Presentation of Acute Cholecystitis: Comparative Outcomes of Same-Admission Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.急性胆囊炎的延迟就诊:同期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较结果
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 May;21(5):840-845. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3378-1. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
10
Risk Factors for Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术困难的危险因素
JSLS. 2016 Oct-Dec;20(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00065.
急性胆囊炎:72 小时并非施行早期胆囊切除术的严格界限。316 例连续患者的结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Dec;398(8):1129-36. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1131-0. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
4
Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304).急性胆囊炎:早期与延迟胆囊切除术的多中心随机试验(ACDC 研究,NCT00447304)。
Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):385-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1599b.
5
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗单纯性胆绞痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 30;2013(6):CD007196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007196.pub3.
6
TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos).TG13 急性胆囊炎的诊断标准及严重程度分级(附视频)。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Jan;20(1):35-46. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0568-9.
7
TG13: Updated Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis.TG13:更新的急性胆管炎和胆囊炎管理东京指南。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Jan;20(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0566-y.
8
TG13 flowchart for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis.急性胆管炎和胆囊炎的 TG13 流程图。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Jan;20(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0563-1.
9
Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within and beyond 72 h of symptom onset during emergency admissions.比较发病 72 小时内和 72 小时后行急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的效果。
World J Surg. 2012 Nov;36(11):2654-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1709-7.
10
Cost utility of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的成本效用比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):256-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2430-1. Epub 2012 Jul 7.