Suppr超能文献

临床无功能垂体腺瘤蛋白质组的异质性分析

Heterogeneity analysis of the proteomes in clinically nonfunctional pituitary adenomas.

作者信息

Zhan Xianquan, Wang Xiaowei, Long Ying, Desiderio Dominic M

出版信息

BMC Med Genomics. 2014 Dec 24;7:69. doi: 10.1186/s12920-014-0069-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinically nonfunctional pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) without any clinical elevation of hormone and with a difficulty in its early-stage diagnosis are highly heterogeneous with different hormone expressions in NFPA tissues, including luteinizing hormone (LH)-positive, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)-positive, LH/FSH-positive, and negative (NF). Elucidation of molecular mechanisms and discovery of biomarkers common and specific to those different subtypes of NFPAs will benefit NFPA patients in early-stage diagnosis and individualized treatment.

METHODS

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DGE) and PDQuest image analyses were used to compare proteomes of different NFPA subtypes (NF-, LH-, FSH-, and LH/FSH-positive) relative to control pituitaries (Con). Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were characterized with mass spectrometry (MS). Each set of DEPs in four NFPA subtypes was evaluated with overlap analysis and signaling pathway network analysis with comparison to determine any DEP and pathway network that are common and specific to each NFPA subtype.

RESULTS

A total of 93 differential protein-spots were determined with comparison of each NFPA type (NF-, LH-, FSH-, and LH/FSH-positive) versus control pituitaries. A total of 76 protein-spots were MS-identified (59 DEPs in NF vs. Con; 65 DEPs in LH vs. Con; 63 DEPs in FSH vs. Con; and 55 DEPs in LH/FSH vs. Con). A set of DEPs and pathway network data were common and specific to each NFPA subtype. Four important common pathway systems included MAPK-signaling abnormality, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cell-cycle dysregulation. However, these pathway systems were, in fact, different among four NFPA subtypes with different protein-expression levels of most of nodes, different protein profiles, and different pathway network profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

These result data demonstrate that common and specific DEPs and pathway networks exist in four NFPA subtypes, and clarify proteome heterogeneity of four NFPA subtypes. Those findings will help to elucidate molecular mechanisms of NFPAs, and discover protein biomarkers to effectively manage NFPA patients towards personalized medicine.

摘要

背景

临床无功能垂体腺瘤(NFPA)无任何激素的临床升高且早期诊断困难,其组织中激素表达各异,具有高度异质性,包括促黄体生成素(LH)阳性、促卵泡生成素(FSH)阳性、LH/FSH阳性和阴性(NF)。阐明这些不同亚型NFPA的分子机制并发现其共同和特异的生物标志物,将有助于NFPA患者的早期诊断和个体化治疗。

方法

采用二维凝胶电泳(2DGE)和PDQuest图像分析,比较不同NFPA亚型(NF-、LH-、FSH-和LH/FSH阳性)与对照垂体(Con)的蛋白质组。用质谱(MS)对差异表达蛋白(DEP)进行表征。对四种NFPA亚型中的每组DEP进行重叠分析和信号通路网络分析,以确定每种NFPA亚型共同和特异的DEP及通路网络。

结果

将每种NFPA类型(NF-、LH-、FSH-和LH/FSH阳性)与对照垂体比较,共确定了93个差异蛋白点。共鉴定出76个蛋白点(NF与Con比较有59个DEP;LH与Con比较有65个DEP;FSH与Con比较有63个DEP;LH/FSH与Con比较有55个DEP)。每组DEP和通路网络数据对每种NFPA亚型都是共同且特异的。四个重要的共同通路系统包括丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)信号异常、氧化应激、线粒体功能障碍和细胞周期失调。然而,实际上这四个NFPA亚型中的这些通路系统不同,大多数节点的蛋白表达水平不同、蛋白谱不同且通路网络谱不同。

结论

这些结果数据表明,四种NFPA亚型中存在共同和特异的DEP及通路网络,阐明了四种NFPA亚型的蛋白质组异质性。这些发现将有助于阐明NFPA的分子机制,并发现蛋白质生物标志物,以有效地针对个性化医疗管理NFPA患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46ec/4302698/06c776818f22/12920_2014_69_Sch1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验