Kausto Johanna, Viikari-Juntura Eira, Virta Lauri J, Gould Raija, Koskinen Aki, Solovieva Svetlana
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (SII), Turku, Finland.
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 24;4(12):e006685. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006685.
To examine the effect of the new legislation on partial sickness benefit on subsequent work participation of Finns with long-term sickness absence. Additionally, we investigated whether the effect differed by sex, age or diagnostic category.
A register-based quasi-experimental study compared the intervention (partial sick leave) group with the comparison (full sick leave) group regarding their pre-post differences in the outcome. The preintervention and postintervention period each consisted of 365 days.
Nationwide, individual-level data on the beneficiaries of partial or full sickness benefit in 2008 were obtained from national sickness insurance, pension and earnings registers.
1738 persons in the intervention and 56,754 persons in the comparison group.
Work participation, measured as the proportion (%) of time within 365 days when participants were gainfully employed and did not receive either partial or full ill-health-related or unemployment benefits.
Although work participation declined in both groups, the decline was 5% (absolute difference-in-differences) smaller in the intervention than in the comparison group, with a minor sex difference. The beneficial effect of partial sick leave was seen especially among those aged 45-54 (5%) and 55-65 (6%) and in mental disorders (13%). When the groups were rendered more exchangeable (propensity score matching on age, sex, diagnostic category, income, occupation, insurance district, work participation, sickness absence, rehabilitation periods and unemployment, prior to intervention and their interaction terms), the effects on work participation were doubled and seen in all age groups and in other diagnostic categories than traumas.
The results suggest that the new legislation has potential to increase work participation of the population with long-term sickness absence in Finland. If applied in a larger scale, partial sick leave may turn out to be a useful tool in reducing withdrawal of workers from the labour market due to health reasons.
研究新的部分病假立法对长期病假的芬兰人后续工作参与情况的影响。此外,我们还调查了这种影响在性别、年龄或诊断类别上是否存在差异。
一项基于登记册的准实验研究,比较了干预组(部分病假)和对照组(全病假)在结果上的前后差异。干预前和干预后阶段各为365天。
从国家疾病保险、养老金和收入登记册中获取了2008年全国范围内部分或全病假受益人的个人层面数据。
干预组1738人,对照组56754人。
工作参与度:以参与者在365天内有收益性就业且未领取部分或全部与健康不佳相关的福利或失业福利的时间比例(%)来衡量。
尽管两组的工作参与度均有所下降,但干预组的下降幅度比对照组小5%(绝对差异),且存在微小的性别差异。部分病假的有益效果尤其在45 - 54岁(5%)和55 - 65岁(6%)人群以及精神障碍患者(13%)中较为明显。当两组的可比性提高(在干预前根据年龄、性别、诊断类别、收入、职业、保险区域、工作参与度、病假情况、康复期和失业情况及其交互项进行倾向得分匹配)时,对工作参与度的影响翻倍,且在所有年龄组以及除创伤外的其他诊断类别中均有体现。
结果表明,新立法有可能提高芬兰长期病假人群的工作参与度。如果大规模应用,部分病假可能会成为减少因健康原因导致工人退出劳动力市场的有用工具。