• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与心理健康问题患者一起使用时,13项日常职业满意度量表的心理测量特性和因素结构。

Psychometric properties and factor structure of the 13-item satisfaction with daily occupations scale when used with people with mental health problems.

作者信息

Eklund Mona, Bäckström Martin, Eakman Aaron M

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Occupational Therapy and Occupational Science, Lund University, PO Box 157, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Dec 24;12:191. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0191-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-014-0191-3
PMID:25539859
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4302612/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In mental health care practice and research it is increasingly recognized that clients' subjective perceptions of everyday occupations, such as satisfaction, are important in recovery from mental illness. Instruments thus need to be developed to assess satisfaction with everyday occupations. The aim of the present study was to assess psychometric properties of the 13-item Satisfaction with Daily Occupation (SDO-13) when used with people with mental health problems, including its internal consistency, factor structure, construct validity and whether the scale produced ceiling or floor effects. An additional question concerned if the factor structure varied whether the participants were, or were not, presently engaged in the activity they rated.

METHODS

The interview-based SDO-13 includes items pertaining to work/studies, leisure, home maintenance, and self-care occupations. Whether the person currently performs an occupation or not, he/she is asked to indicate his/her satisfaction with that occupation. The SDO-13 was completed with 184 persons with mental illness. Residual variables were created to remove the variation linked with currently performing the targeted occupation or not and to assess the factor structure of the SDO-13. The indicators of general satisfaction with daily occupations, self-esteem and global functioning were used to assess construct validity. The statistical methods included tests of homogeneity, confirmatory factor analysis and Pearson correlations.

RESULTS

The internal consistency was satisfactory at 0.79. A three-factor solution indicated that the construct behind the SDO-13 was composed of three facets; Taking care of oneself and the home, Work and studies, and Leisure and relaxation. The same factor structure was valid for both original scores and the residuals. An expected pattern of correlations with the indicators was mainly found, suggesting basic construct validity. No ceiling or floor effects were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, the findings suggest the SDO-13 is a reliable and robust instrument that may be used to get an overview of the satisfaction people living with mental illness derive from their daily occupations.

摘要

背景

在精神卫生保健实践和研究中,人们越来越认识到服务对象对日常活动的主观感受,如满意度,对精神疾病康复至关重要。因此需要开发相关工具来评估对日常活动的满意度。本研究的目的是评估13项日常活动满意度量表(SDO - 13)用于有精神健康问题的人群时的心理测量特性,包括其内部一致性、因子结构、结构效度以及该量表是否产生天花板效应或地板效应。另一个问题是,参与者是否正在从事他们所评价的活动,因子结构是否会有所不同。

方法

基于访谈的SDO - 13包括与工作/学习、休闲、家庭维护和自我护理活动相关的项目。无论此人目前是否从事某项活动,均要求其表明对该活动的满意度。184名患有精神疾病的患者完成了SDO - 13量表。创建残差变量以消除与当前是否从事目标活动相关的变异,并评估SDO - 13的因子结构。使用日常活动总体满意度、自尊和整体功能指标来评估结构效度。统计方法包括同质性检验、验证性因子分析和Pearson相关性分析。

结果

内部一致性良好,为0.79。三因子模型表明,SDO - 13背后的结构由三个方面组成:自我与家庭照料、工作与学习、休闲与放松。原始分数和残差的因子结构相同。主要发现了与指标的预期相关模式,表明基本的结构效度。未发现天花板效应或地板效应。

结论

综上所述,研究结果表明SDO - 13是一种可靠且稳健的工具,可用于了解患有精神疾病的人从日常活动中获得的满意度概况。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties and factor structure of the 13-item satisfaction with daily occupations scale when used with people with mental health problems.与心理健康问题患者一起使用时,13项日常职业满意度量表的心理测量特性和因素结构。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Dec 24;12:191. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0191-3.
2
Perception of occupational balance by people with mental illness: A new methodology.患有精神疾病的人对职业平衡的认知:一种新方法。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2016 Jul;23(4):304-13. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2016.1143529. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
3
The Satisfaction with Daily Occupations (SDO-13) Scale: Psychometric Properties among Clients in Primary Care in Sweden.日常活动满意度(SDO - 13)量表:瑞典初级保健患者的心理测量特性
Occup Ther Health Care. 2016;30(1):29-41. doi: 10.3109/07380577.2015.1048036. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of Satisfaction with Daily Occupations (SDO).丹麦版日常活动满意度量表(SDO)的心理测量学评估。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2014 May;21(3):166-71. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2013.853097. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
5
Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Daily Occupations (SDO) instrument and the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA) in women with scleroderma and without known illness.硬皮病女性和无已知疾病女性的日常职业满意度(SDO)量表及曼彻斯特生活质量简短评估(MANSA)的心理测量特性。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2006 Mar;13(1):23-30. doi: 10.1080/11038120500239578.
6
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation and Reliability of the Spanish Satisfaction with Daily Occupations-Occupational Balance (SDO-OB): An Evaluation Tool for People with Mental Disorders.跨文化调适、验证及西班牙语日常职业满意度-职业平衡(SDO-OB)的信度:精神障碍患者的评估工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 30;17(23):8906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238906.
7
Psychometric testing of a self-report measure of engagement in productive occupations.一种关于参与生产性职业的自我报告测量方法的心理测量测试。
Can J Occup Ther. 2013 Apr;80(2):101-10. doi: 10.1177/0008417413481956.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Satisfaction With Daily Occupations and Occupational Balance in Spanish Stroke Survivors.西班牙语版日常生活满意度和职业平衡量表在西班牙脑卒中幸存者中的心理测量特性。
Am J Occup Ther. 2024 May 1;78(3). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050454.
9
Satisfaction with Daily Occupations for Elderly People (SDO-E)-Adaptation and Psychometric Testing.老年人日常活动满意度量表(SDO-E)的改编与心理测量测试
Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Sep 25;5(4):61. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5040061.
10
Factors influencing subjective perceptions of everyday occupations: comparing day centre attendees with non-attendees.影响日常活动主观认知的因素:日间护理中心参与者与非参与者的比较
Scand J Occup Ther. 2012 Jan;19(1):68-77. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2011.560963. Epub 2011 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A feasibility study of the internet-based intervention "Strategies for Empowering activities in Everyday life" (SEE 1.0) applied for people with stroke.一项针对中风患者应用基于互联网的干预措施“日常生活中增强活动能力策略”(SEE 1.0)的可行性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 4;25(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12456-8.
2
Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review.时间利用视角在社区心理健康实践中的贡献:一项范围综述
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 11;15:1461705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1461705. eCollection 2024.
3
Feasibility and tolerability of moderate intensity regular physical exercise as treatment for core symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomized pilot study.中等强度规律体育锻炼作为注意缺陷多动障碍核心症状治疗方法的可行性和耐受性:一项随机试点研究。
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 May 15;5:1133256. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1133256. eCollection 2023.
4
Worker role perceptions and work participation among people with mental health issues taking part in interventions focusing on everyday life.从事以日常生活为重点的干预措施的心理健康问题患者的工人角色认知和工作参与。
Work. 2023;76(2):533-547. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220582.
5
Evaluation of the "Let's Get Organized" group intervention to improve time management: protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.“让我们有条理”小组干预以改善时间管理的评价:一项多中心随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2021 Sep 19;22(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05578-x.
6
Work experiences, resources, and beliefs among vulnerable subgroups of mental health care users.精神卫生服务使用者弱势群体的工作经历、资源和信念。
Work. 2021;70(1):125-134. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213559.
7
A cross-sectional study addressing the importance of work and other everyday activities for well-being among people with mental illness: does additional vulnerability matter?一项横断面研究探讨了工作和其他日常活动对于心理健康人群幸福感的重要性:额外的脆弱性是否重要?
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 31;21(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03388-8.
8
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation and Reliability of the Spanish Satisfaction with Daily Occupations-Occupational Balance (SDO-OB): An Evaluation Tool for People with Mental Disorders.跨文化调适、验证及西班牙语日常职业满意度-职业平衡(SDO-OB)的信度:精神障碍患者的评估工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 30;17(23):8906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238906.
9
Exploring mediators of the recovery process over time among mental health service users, using a mixed model regression analysis based on cluster RCT data.基于群组 RCT 数据,采用混合模型回归分析,探索精神卫生服务使用者在康复过程中的中介因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 30;20(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02924-2.
10
Effectiveness of Balancing Everyday Life (BEL) versus standard occupational therapy for activity engagement and functioning among people with mental illness - a cluster RCT study.平衡日常生活(BEL)与标准职业疗法对精神疾病患者活动参与和功能的效果比较 - 一项群组 RCT 研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 9;17(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1524-7.

本文引用的文献

1
DSM-5 and the assessment of functioning: the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0).《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版与功能评估:世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42(2):173-81.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of Satisfaction with Daily Occupations (SDO).丹麦版日常活动满意度量表(SDO)的心理测量学评估。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2014 May;21(3):166-71. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2013.853097. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
3
What does recovery mean in practice? A qualitative analysis of international recovery-oriented practice guidance.在实践中,康复意味着什么?对国际康复导向实践指南的定性分析。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Dec;62(12):1470-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.001312011.
4
Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis.心理健康中个人康复的概念框架:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):445-52. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733.
5
A review and critique of well-being in occupational therapy and occupational science.职业治疗与职业科学中的幸福感综述与批判
Scand J Occup Ther. 2011 Jun;18(2):93-100. doi: 10.3109/11038121003615327. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
6
Psychometric properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: overall and across demographic groups living within the United States.罗森伯格自尊量表的心理测量特性:居住在美国的总体人口和各人口群体。
Eval Health Prof. 2010 Mar;33(1):56-80. doi: 10.1177/0163278709356187.
7
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
8
Work status, daily activities and quality of life among people with severe mental illness.重度精神疾病患者的工作状况、日常活动及生活质量
Qual Life Res. 2009 Mar;18(2):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9431-5. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
9
Relationships between occupational factors and health and well-being in individuals with persistent mental illness living in the community.社区中患有持续性精神疾病的个体的职业因素与健康和幸福感之间的关系。
Can J Occup Ther. 2007 Oct 4;74(4):303-13. doi: 10.1177/000841740707400403.
10
Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Daily Occupations (SDO) instrument and the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA) in women with scleroderma and without known illness.硬皮病女性和无已知疾病女性的日常职业满意度(SDO)量表及曼彻斯特生活质量简短评估(MANSA)的心理测量特性。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2006 Mar;13(1):23-30. doi: 10.1080/11038120500239578.