• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切换开关:权力、社会主导地位与心理能量变化预期

Flipping the switch: power, social dominance, and expectancies of mental energy change.

作者信息

Egan Patrick M, Hirt Edward R

机构信息

Indiana University, Bloomington, USA

Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Mar;41(3):336-50. doi: 10.1177/0146167214565054. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1177/0146167214565054
PMID:25540327
Abstract

Research suggests that high levels of interpersonal power can promote enhanced executive functioning capabilities. The present work explored whether this effect is contingent upon expectancies concerning power's downstream cognitive consequences. Study 1 showed that social dominance orientation (SDO) predicted idiosyncratic expectancies of mental energy change toward interpersonal power. Study 2 showed that SDO moderated the executive functioning changes associated with interpersonal power and that this moderation effect was contingent upon changes in perceived mental depletion. Study 3 showed that directly manipulating expectancies of mental energy change concerning interpersonal power moderated the executive functioning consequences of power and that this moderation effect was contingent upon SDO and changes in perceived mental depletion. Together, the present findings underscore the importance of expectancies and individual differences in understanding the effects of interpersonal power.

摘要

研究表明,高水平的人际权力能够促进执行功能能力的增强。本研究探讨了这种效应是否取决于对权力下游认知后果的预期。研究1表明,社会支配取向(SDO)预测了对人际权力的心理能量变化的独特预期。研究2表明,SDO调节了与人际权力相关的执行功能变化,且这种调节效应取决于感知到的心理耗竭的变化。研究3表明,直接操纵对人际权力的心理能量变化的预期,调节了权力对执行功能的影响,且这种调节效应取决于SDO和感知到的心理耗竭的变化。总之,本研究结果强调了预期和个体差异在理解人际权力影响方面的重要性。

相似文献

1
Flipping the switch: power, social dominance, and expectancies of mental energy change.切换开关:权力、社会主导地位与心理能量变化预期
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Mar;41(3):336-50. doi: 10.1177/0146167214565054. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
2
Power Moderates the Effects of Social Dominance Orientation on Punishment: An Experimental Analysis.权力调节社会支配取向对惩罚的影响:一项实验分析。
Psychol Rep. 2019 Feb;122(1):201-218. doi: 10.1177/0033294118755095. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
3
Illusory control: a generative force behind power's far-reaching effects.虚幻控制:权力深远影响背后的一股生成力量。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):502-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02311.x. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
4
Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior.对主宰和优越的渴望所带来的环境后果。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Sep;39(9):1127-38. doi: 10.1177/0146167213490805. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
5
The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.社会支配取向的本质:使用新的SDO₇量表对群体间不平等偏好进行理论化和测量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Dec;109(6):1003-28. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000033. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
6
The personality bases of ideology: a one-year longitudinal study.意识形态的人格基础:一项为期一年的纵向研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep-Oct;150(5):540-59. doi: 10.1080/00224540903365364.
7
Different meanings of the social dominance orientation concept: predicting political attitudes over time.社会支配倾向概念的不同含义:预测政治态度随时间的变化。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2010 Jun;49(Pt 2):385-404. doi: 10.1348/014466609X435723. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
8
Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups.右翼威权主义和社会支配取向对外群体态度的差异影响及其通过来自外群体的威胁和与外群体的竞争所起的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):684-96. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284282.
9
Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power.关系取向作为社会权力效应的调节变量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Feb;80(2):173-87. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.173.
10
Social dominance orientation predicts drive for muscularity among British men.社会支配倾向预测英国男性的肌肉发达驱力。
Body Image. 2013 Sep;10(4):653-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Are many sex/gender differences really power differences?许多性别差异真的是权力差异吗?
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Feb 27;3(2):pgae025. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae025. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Boosts for walking: how humorous messages increase brisk walking among cognitively fatigued individuals.促进步行:幽默信息如何增加认知疲劳个体的轻快步行。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 9;24(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17464-z.
3
The self-control consequences of political ideology.政治意识形态的自我控制后果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 7;112(27):8250-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503530112. Epub 2015 Jun 22.