Department of Nephrology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Nephrology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, China.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e114369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114369. eCollection 2014.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) is usually type 1 of the cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) and has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Early recognition of AKI is critical. This study was to determine if the new KDIGO criteria (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) for identification and short-term prognosis of early CRS type 1 was superior to the previous RIFLE and AKIN criteria.
The association between AKI diagnosed by KDIGO but not by RIFLE or AKIN and in-hospital mortality was retrospectively evaluated in 1005 Chinese adult patients with AHF between July 2008 and May 2012. AKI was defined as RIFLE, AKIN and KDIGO criteria, respectively. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis of in-hospital mortality.
Within 7 days on admission, the incidence of CRS type 1 was 38.9% by KDIGO criteria, 34.7% by AKIN, and 32.1% by RIFLE. A total of 110 (10.9%) cases were additional diagnosed by KDIGO criteria but not by RIFLE or AKIN. 89.1% of them were in Stage 1 (AKIN) or Stage Risk (RIFLE). They accounted for 18.4% (25 cases) of the overall death. After adjustment, this proportion remained an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality [odds ratios (OR)3.24, 95% confidence interval(95%CI) 1.97-5.35]. Kaplan-Meier curve showed AKI patients by RIFLE, AKIN, KDIGO and [K(+)R(-)+K(+)A(-)] had lower hospital survival than non-AKI patients (Log Rank P<0.001).
KDIGO criteria identified significantly more CRS type 1 episodes than RIFLE or AKIN. AKI missed diagnosed by RIFLE or AKIN criteria was an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality, indicating the new KDIGO criteria was superior to RIFLE and AKIN in predicting short-term outcomes in early CRS type 1.
急性心力衰竭(AHF)住院患者的急性肾损伤(AKI)通常为 1 型心肾综合征(CRS),与发病率和死亡率增加相关。早期识别 AKI 至关重要。本研究旨在确定新的 KDIGO(肾脏疾病:改善全球预后)标准是否优于之前的 RIFLE 和 AKIN 标准,用于识别和预测 1 型早期 CRS。
回顾性分析 2008 年 7 月至 2012 年 5 月间 1005 例中国成年 AHF 患者,应用 KDIGO 但非 RIFLE 或 AKIN 标准诊断 AKI 与院内死亡率的相关性。AKI 分别用 RIFLE、AKIN 和 KDIGO 标准定义。多变量分析采用 Cox 回归。
入院 7 天内,KDIGO 标准诊断的 CRS 1 型发生率为 38.9%,AKIN 为 34.7%,RIFLE 为 32.1%。KDIGO 标准额外诊断的 110 例(10.9%)患者,未被 RIFLE 或 AKIN 诊断。其中 89.1%为 AKIN 1 期或 RIFLE 风险期。它们占总死亡人数的 18.4%(25 例)。调整后,该比例仍是院内死亡率的独立危险因素[比值比(OR)3.24,95%置信区间(95%CI)1.97-5.35]。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示,RIFLE、AKIN、KDIGO 和 [K(+)R(-)+K(+)A(-)] 诊断的 AKI 患者的院内生存率低于非 AKI 患者(Log Rank P<0.001)。
KDIGO 标准比 RIFLE 或 AKIN 标准识别出更多的 1 型 CRS 发作。RIFLE 或 AKIN 标准漏诊的 AKI 是院内死亡率的独立危险因素,表明新的 KDIGO 标准在预测 1 型早期 CRS 的短期预后方面优于 RIFLE 和 AKIN。