Drake Christopher L, Belcher Ren, Howard Ryan, Roth Thomas, Levin Albert M, Gumenyuk Valentina
Sleep Disorders and Research Center, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Sleep Res. 2015 Jun;24(3):254-61. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12264. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
The objective of the current study was to determine if night-shift workers carrying the five-repeat variant of the Period 3 gene show elevated levels of nocturnal sleepiness and earlier circadian phase compared with homozygotes for the four-repeat allele. Twenty-four permanent night-shift workers were randomly selected from a larger study. Participants took part in an observational laboratory protocol including an overnight multiple sleep latency test and half-hourly saliva collection for calculation of dim-light melatonin onset. Period 3(-/5) shift workers had significantly lower multiple sleep latency test during overnight work hours compared with Period 3(4/4) workers (3.52 ± 23.44 min versus 10.39 ± 6.41 min, P = 0.003). We observed no significant difference in sleepiness during early morning hours following acute sleep deprivation. Long-allele carriers indicated significantly higher sleepiness on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale administered at 17:00 hours (12.08 ± 2.55 versus 8.00 ± 1.94, P < 0.001). We observed a significantly earlier melatonin onset in Period 3(-/5) individuals compared with Period 3(4/4) shift workers (20:44 ± 6:37 versus 02:46 ± 4:58, P = 0.021). Regression analysis suggests that Period 3 genotype independently predicts sleepiness even after controlling for variations in circadian phase, but we were unable to link Period 3 to circadian phase when controlling for sleepiness. Period 3(-/5) shift workers showed both subjective and objective sleepiness in the pathological range, while their Period 3(4/4) counterparts showed sleepiness within normal limits. Period 3(-/5) night workers also show a mean circadian phase 6 h earlier (i.e. less adapted) than Period 3(4/4) workers. Because Period 3(-/5) workers have maladaptive circadian phase as well as pathological levels of sleepiness, they may be at greater risk for occupational and automotive accidents. We interpret these findings as a call for future research on the role of Period 3 in sleepiness and circadian phase, especially as they relate to night work.
本研究的目的是确定携带Period 3基因五重复变体的夜班工作者与四重复等位基因纯合子相比,夜间嗜睡水平是否升高以及昼夜节律相位是否更早。从一项更大规模的研究中随机选取了24名长期夜班工作者。参与者参加了一项观察性实验室方案,包括夜间多次睡眠潜伏期测试以及每半小时采集一次唾液以计算暗光褪黑素起始时间。与Period 3(4/4)工作者相比,Period 3(-/5)夜班工作者在夜间工作时间的多次睡眠潜伏期测试显著更低(3.52±23.44分钟对10.39±6.41分钟,P = 0.003)。在急性睡眠剥夺后的清晨时段,我们未观察到嗜睡方面的显著差异。在17:00进行的爱泼华嗜睡量表测试中,长等位基因携带者的嗜睡程度显著更高(12.08±2.55对8.00±1.94,P < 0.001)。与Period 3(4/4)夜班工作者相比,我们观察到Period 3(-/5)个体的褪黑素起始时间显著更早(分别为20:44±6:37和02:46±4:58,P = 0.021)。回归分析表明,即使在控制昼夜节律相位变化后,Period 3基因型仍能独立预测嗜睡程度,但在控制嗜睡程度时,我们无法将Period 3与昼夜节律相位联系起来。Period 3(-/5)夜班工作者在主观和客观上均表现出病理性范围的嗜睡,而其Period 3(4/4)的同行则表现出正常范围内的嗜睡。Period 3(-/5)夜班工作者的平均昼夜节律相位也比Period 3(4/4)工作者早6小时(即适应性更差)。由于Period 3(-/5)工作者存在适应不良的昼夜节律相位以及病理性的嗜睡水平,他们可能面临更高的职业和交通事故风险。我们将这些发现解读为呼吁未来对Period 3在嗜睡和昼夜节律相位中的作用进行研究,特别是与夜班工作相关的方面。