Cellamare Matteo, Sambucini Valeria
Department of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Stat Med. 2015 Mar 15;34(6):1059-78. doi: 10.1002/sim.6396. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
The rate of failure in phase III oncology trials is surprisingly high, partly owing to inadequate phase II studies. Recently, the use of randomized designs in phase II is being increasingly recommended, to avoid the limits of studies that use a historical control. We propose a two-arm two-stage design based on a Bayesian predictive approach. The idea is to ensure a large probability, expressed in terms of the prior predictive probability of the data, of obtaining a substantial posterior evidence in favour of the experimental treatment, under the assumption that it is actually more effective than the standard agent. This design is a randomized version of the two-stage design that has been proposed for single-arm phase II trials by Sambucini. We examine the main features of our novel design as all the parameters involved vary and compare our approach with Jung's minimax and optimal designs. An illustrative example is also provided online as a supplementary material to this article.
肿瘤学III期试验的失败率出奇地高,部分原因是II期研究不充分。最近,越来越多的人建议在II期使用随机设计,以避免使用历史对照研究的局限性。我们提出了一种基于贝叶斯预测方法的双臂两阶段设计。其理念是,在假设实验性治疗实际上比标准药物更有效的情况下,确保以数据的先验预测概率表示的、获得支持实验性治疗的大量后验证据的大概率。这种设计是Sambucini为单臂II期试验提出的两阶段设计的随机版本。我们研究了随着所有相关参数变化,我们新设计的主要特征,并将我们的方法与Jung的极小极大设计和最优设计进行比较。本文还在线提供了一个示例作为补充材料。