Lindestam Arlehamn Cecilia S, Paul Sinu, Mele Federico, Huang Charlie, Greenbaum Jason A, Vita Randi, Sidney John, Peters Bjoern, Sallusto Federica, Sette Alessandro
Division of Vaccine Discovery, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, CA 92037; and
Division of Vaccine Discovery, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, CA 92037; and.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 13;112(2):E147-55. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416537112. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
A previous unbiased genome-wide analysis of CD4 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) recognition using peripheral blood mononuclear cells from individuals with latent MTB infection (LTBI) or nonexposed healthy controls (HCs) revealed that certain MTB sequences were unexpectedly recognized by HCs. In the present study, it was found that, based on their pattern of reactivity, epitopes could be divided into LTBI-specific, mixed reactivity, and HC-specific categories. This pattern corresponded to sequence conservation in nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTMs), suggesting environmental exposure as an underlying cause of differential reactivity. LTBI-specific epitopes were found to be hyperconserved, as previously reported, whereas the opposite was true for NTM conserved epitopes, suggesting that intragenus conservation also influences host pathogen adaptation. The biological relevance of this observation was demonstrated further by several observations. First, the T cells elicited by MTB/NTM cross-reactive epitopes in HCs were found mainly in a CCR6(+)CXCR3(+) memory subset, similar to findings in LTBI individuals. Thus, both MTB and NTM appear to elicit a phenotypically similar T-cell response. Second, T cells reactive to MTB/NTM-conserved epitopes responded to naturally processed epitopes from MTB and NTMs, whereas T cells reactive to MTB-specific epitopes responded only to MTB. Third, cross-reactivity could be translated to antigen recognition. Several MTB candidate vaccine antigens were cross-reactive, but others were MTB-specific. Finally, NTM-specific epitopes that elicit T cells that recognize NTMs but not MTB were identified. These epitopes can be used to characterize T-cell responses to NTMs, eliminating the confounding factor of MTB cross-recognition and providing insights into vaccine design and evaluation.
先前一项利用来自潜伏性结核分枝杆菌感染(LTBI)个体或未接触过结核分枝杆菌的健康对照(HCs)的外周血单个核细胞,对CD4结核分枝杆菌(MTB)识别进行的无偏全基因组分析显示,某些MTB序列意外地被HCs识别。在本研究中,发现根据其反应模式,表位可分为LTBI特异性、混合反应性和HC特异性类别。这种模式与非结核分枝杆菌(NTMs)中的序列保守性相对应,提示环境暴露是反应性差异的潜在原因。如先前报道,LTBI特异性表位被发现是高度保守的,而NTM保守表位则相反,这表明属内保守性也影响宿主病原体适应性。这一观察结果的生物学相关性通过多项观察得到进一步证实。首先,发现HCs中由MTB/NTM交叉反应性表位引发的T细胞主要存在于CCR6(+)CXCR3(+)记忆亚群中,这与LTBI个体中的发现相似。因此,MTB和NTM似乎都引发了表型相似的T细胞反应。其次,对MTB/NTM保守表位有反应的T细胞对来自MTB和NTMs的天然加工表位有反应,而对MTB特异性表位有反应的T细胞仅对MTB有反应。第三,交叉反应性可转化为抗原识别。几种MTB候选疫苗抗原具有交叉反应性,但其他一些则是MTB特异性的。最后,鉴定出了能引发识别NTMs但不识别MTB的T细胞的NTM特异性表位。这些表位可用于表征T细胞对NTMs的反应,消除MTB交叉识别的混杂因素,并为疫苗设计和评估提供见解。