Bauldry Shawn, Bollen Kenneth A, Adair Linda S
University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama , USA.
Blood Press. 2015 Apr;24(2):96-102. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2014.986952. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
Readings of blood pressure are known to be subject to measurement error, but the optimal method for combining multiple readings is unknown. This study assesses different sources of measurement error in blood pressure readings and assesses methods for combining multiple readings using data from a sample of adolescents/young adults who were part of a longitudinal epidemiological study based in Cebu, Philippines. Three sets of blood pressure readings were collected at 2-year intervals for 2127 adolescents and young adults as part of the Cebu National Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Study. Multi-trait, multi-method (MTMM) structural equation models in different groups were used to decompose measurement error in the blood pressure readings into systematic and random components and to examine patterns in the measurement across males and females and over time. The results reveal differences in the measurement properties of blood pressure readings by sex and over time that suggest the combination of multiple readings should be handled separately for these groups at different time points. The results indicate that an average (mean) of the blood pressure readings has high validity relative to a more complicated factor-score-based linear combination of the readings.
血压读数存在测量误差,这是已知的,但将多个读数进行合并的最佳方法尚不清楚。本研究评估了血压读数测量误差的不同来源,并使用来自菲律宾宿务一项纵向流行病学研究样本中的青少年/青年的数据,评估了合并多个读数的方法。作为宿务国家纵向健康与营养研究的一部分,每隔两年收集了2127名青少年和青年的三组血压读数。使用不同组别的多特质、多方法(MTMM)结构方程模型,将血压读数中的测量误差分解为系统成分和随机成分,并研究男性和女性在不同时间点的测量模式。结果揭示了血压读数的测量特性在性别和时间上的差异,这表明对于这些不同时间点的组别,应分别处理多个读数的合并问题。结果表明,相对于基于更复杂的因子得分的读数线性组合,血压读数的平均值具有较高的效度。