Suppr超能文献

从各种食源真细菌中近乎定量地采样基因组DNA。

The near-quantitative sampling of genomic DNA from various food-borne Eubacteria.

作者信息

Irwin Peter, Nguyen Ly, He Yiping, Paoli George, Gehring Andrew, Chen Chin-Yi

机构信息

Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Molecular Characterization of Foodborne Pathogens Research Unit, Eastern Regional Research Center, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, PA, 19038, USA.

出版信息

BMC Microbiol. 2014 Dec 31;14:326. doi: 10.1186/s12866-014-0326-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The disruption of the bacterial cell wall plays an important part in achieving quantitative extraction of DNA from Eubacteria essential for accurate analyses of genetic material recovered from environmental samples.

RESULTS

In this work we have tested a dozen commercial bacterial genomic DNA extraction methodologies on an average of 7.70 × 10(6) (±9.05%), 4.77 × 10(8) (±31.0%), and 5.93 × 10(8) (±4.69%) colony forming units (CFU) associated with 3 cultures (n = 3) each of Brochothrix thermosphacta (Bt; Gram-positive), Shigella sonnei (Ss; Gram-negative), and Escherichia coli O79 (Ec; Gram-negative). We have utilized real-time PCR (qPCR) quantification with two specific sets of primers associated with the 16S rRNA "gene" to determine the number of copies CFU(-1) by comparing the unknown target DNA qPCR results with standards for each primer set. Based upon statistical analyses of our results, we determined that the Agencourt Genfind v2, High Pure PCR Template Prep Kit, and Omnilyse methods consistently provided the best yield of genomic DNA ranging from 141 to 934, 8 to 21, and 16 to 27 16S rDNA copies CFU(-1) for Bt, Ss, and Ec. If one assumes 6-7 copies of the 16S rRNA gene per genome, between 1 and 3 genomes per actively dividing cell and  ≥  100 cells CFU(-1) for Bt (found to be a reasonable assumption using an optical method expounded upon herein) or between 1 and 2 cells CFU(-1) for either Ss or Ec, then the Omnilyse procedure provided nearly quantitative extraction of genomic DNA from these isolates (934 ± 19.9 copies CFU(-1) for Bt; 20.8 ± 2.68 copies CFU(-1) for Ss; 26.9 ± 3.39 copies CFU(-1) for Ec). The Agencourt, High Pure, and Omnilyse technologies were subsequently assessed using 5 additional Gram-positive and 10 Gram-negative foodborne isolates (n = 3) using a set of "universal" 16S rDNA primers.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the most notable DNA extraction method was found to be the Omnilyse procedure which is a "bead blender" technology involving high frequency agitation in the presence of zirconium silicate beads.

摘要

背景

细菌细胞壁的破坏对于从真细菌中定量提取DNA至关重要,这对于准确分析从环境样本中回收的遗传物质必不可少。

结果

在这项工作中,我们测试了十几种商业细菌基因组DNA提取方法,这些方法分别用于处理与嗜热栖热放线菌(Bt;革兰氏阳性)、宋内志贺氏菌(Ss;革兰氏阴性)和大肠杆菌O79(Ec;革兰氏阴性)的三种培养物(n = 3)相关的平均7.70×10⁶(±9.05%)、4.77×10⁸(±31.0%)和5.93×10⁸(±4.69%)菌落形成单位(CFU)。我们使用与16S rRNA“基因”相关的两组特异性引物进行实时PCR(qPCR)定量,通过将未知目标DNA的qPCR结果与每组引物的标准进行比较,来确定每CFU的拷贝数。基于对结果的统计分析,我们确定Agencourt Genfind v2、高纯PCR模板制备试剂盒和Omnilyse方法始终能提供最佳的基因组DNA产量,对于Bt、Ss和Ec,每CFU分别为141至934、8至21和16至27个16S rDNA拷贝。如果假设每个基因组有6 - 7个16S rRNA基因拷贝,每个活跃分裂细胞有1至3个基因组,对于Bt(使用本文阐述的光学方法发现这是一个合理的假设)每CFU≥100个细胞,或者对于Ss或Ec每CFU为1至2个细胞,那么Omnilyse程序能从这些分离株中近乎定量地提取基因组DNA(对于Bt为934±19.9拷贝CFU⁻¹;对于Ss为20.8±2.68拷贝CFU⁻¹;对于Ec为26.9±3.39拷贝CFU⁻¹)。随后,使用一组“通用”的16S rDNA引物,对另外5种革兰氏阳性和10种革兰氏阴性食源性病原体分离株(n = 3)评估了Agencourt、高纯和Omnilyse技术。

结论

总体而言,最显著的DNA提取方法是Omnilyse程序,它是一种“珠磨法”技术,涉及在硅酸锆珠存在下的高频搅拌。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72dc/4302497/adfbc533fcaf/12866_2014_326_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验