Allegrini Elisa, Vadenbo Carl, Boldrin Alessio, Astrup Thomas Fruergaard
Technical University of Denmark, Department of Environmental Engineering, Building 115, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.
ETH Zurich, Institute of Environmental Engineering, John-von-Neumann-Weg 9, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
J Environ Manage. 2015 Mar 15;151:132-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.032. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
Bottom ash, the main solid output from municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI), has significant potential for the recovery of resources such as scrap metals and aggregates. The utilisation of these resources ideally enables natural resources to be saved. However, the quality of the recovered scrap metals may limit recycling potential, and the utilisation of aggregates may cause the release of toxic substances into the natural environment through leaching. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to a full-scale MSWI bottom ash management and recovery system to identify environmental breakeven points beyond which the burdens of the recovery processes outweigh the environmental benefits from valorising metals and mineral aggregates. Experimental data for the quantity and quality of individual material fractions were used as a basis for LCA modelling. For the aggregates, three disposal routes were compared: landfilling, road sub-base and aggregate in concrete, while specific leaching data were used as the basis for evaluating toxic impacts. The recovery and recycling of aluminium, ferrous, stainless steel and copper scrap were considered, and the importance of aluminium scrap quality, choice of marginal energy technologies and substitution rates between primary and secondary aluminium, stainless steel and ferrous products, were assessed and discussed. The modelling resulted in burdens to toxic impacts associated with metal recycling and leaching from aggregates during utilisation, while large savings were obtained in terms of non-toxic impacts. However, by varying the substitution rate for aluminium recycling between 0.35 and 0.05 (on the basis of aluminium scrap and secondary aluminium alloy market value), it was found that the current recovery system might reach a breakeven point between the benefits of recycling and energy expended on sorting and upgrading the scrap.
底灰是城市固体废物焚烧(MSWI)的主要固体产物,在回收废金属和骨料等资源方面具有巨大潜力。理想情况下,这些资源的利用能够节省自然资源。然而,回收废金属的质量可能会限制回收潜力,并且骨料的利用可能会通过浸出将有毒物质释放到自然环境中。生命周期评估(LCA)被应用于一个全规模的MSWI底灰管理和回收系统,以确定环境盈亏平衡点,超过该点,回收过程的负担将超过金属和矿物骨料增值带来的环境效益。单个物料组分的数量和质量的实验数据被用作LCA建模的基础。对于骨料,比较了三种处置途径:填埋、道路基层和混凝土中的骨料,同时使用特定的浸出数据作为评估毒性影响的基础。考虑了铝、铁、不锈钢和铜废料的回收和再利用,并评估和讨论了铝废料质量、边际能源技术选择以及初级和次级铝、不锈钢和铁制品之间替代率的重要性。建模结果显示,在利用过程中,与金属回收和骨料浸出相关的毒性影响存在负担,而在无毒影响方面则有大量节省。然而,通过将铝回收的替代率在0.35至0.05之间变化(基于铝废料和次级铝合金的市场价值),发现当前的回收系统可能会在回收效益与分选和升级废料所消耗的能源之间达到盈亏平衡点。