Ruibal Alba
Researcher, CONICET Argentina, Córdoba, Argentina.
Reprod Health Matters. 2014 Nov;22(44):42-51. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(14)44803-1.
In 2006, the Constitutional Court of Colombia issued Decision C-355/2006, which liberalized the country's abortion law. The reform was groundbreaking in its argumentation, being one of the first judicial decisions in the world to uphold abortion rights on equality grounds, and the first by a constitutional court to rule on the constitutionality of abortion within a human rights framework. It was also the first of a series of reforms that would liberalize the abortion regulation in four other Latin American countries. The Colombian case is also notable for the process of strategic litigation carried out by feminist organizations after the Court's decision, in order to ensure its implementation and counter the opposition from conservative actors working in State institutions, as well as for the active role played by the Court in that process. Based on fieldwork carried out in Colombia in 2013, this article analyzes the process of progressive implementation and reactionary backlash after Decision C-355/2006, with an emphasis on strategic litigation by the feminist movement and subsequent decisions by the Constitutional Court, which consolidated its jurisprudence in the field of abortion rights. It highlights the role of both feminists and of conservative activists within State institutions as opposing social movements, and the dynamics of political and legal mobilization and counter-mobilization in that process.
2006年,哥伦比亚宪法法院发布了第C-355/2006号判决,该判决使该国的堕胎法自由化。这项改革在论证方面具有开创性,是世界上首批基于平等理由支持堕胎权利的司法判决之一,也是宪法法院在人权框架内就堕胎合宪性作出的首个裁决。它还是一系列改革中的首例,这些改革将使其他四个拉丁美洲国家的堕胎规定自由化。哥伦比亚的案例还因法院判决后女权组织开展的战略诉讼进程而引人注目,该进程旨在确保判决的实施,并对抗国家机构中保守势力的反对,同时也因法院在这一进程中发挥的积极作用而备受关注。基于2013年在哥伦比亚进行的实地调查,本文分析了第C-355/2006号判决后的渐进式实施过程和反动反弹,重点关注女权运动的战略诉讼以及宪法法院随后的判决,这些判决巩固了其在堕胎权利领域的判例法。它突出了女权主义者和国家机构内保守活动家作为对立社会运动的作用,以及这一过程中政治和法律动员与反动员的动态情况。