Suppr超能文献

利用酰胺质子转移磁共振成像对胶质肿瘤进行分级:不同的分析方法。

Grading glial tumors with amide proton transfer MR imaging: different analytical approaches.

作者信息

Sakata Akihiko, Okada Tomohisa, Yamamoto Akira, Kanagaki Mitsunori, Fushimi Yasutaka, Okada Tsutomu, Dodo Toshiki, Arakawa Yoshiki, Schmitt Benjamin, Miyamoto Susumu, Togashi Kaori

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2015 Apr;122(2):339-48. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1715-8. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

Abstract

Amide proton transfer (APT) magnetic resonance imaging is gaining attention for its capability for grading glial tumors. Usually, a representative slice is analyzed. Different definitions of tumor areas have been employed in previous studies. We hypothesized that the accuracy of APT imaging for brain tumor grading may depend upon the analytical methodology used, such as selection of regions of interest (ROIs), single or multiple tumor slices, and whether or not there is normalization to the contralateral white matter. This study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was waived. Twenty-six patients with histologically proven glial tumors underwent preoperative APT imaging with a three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence. Two neuroradiologists independently analyzed APT asymmetry (APTasym) images by placing ROIs on both a single representative slice (RS) and all slices including tumor (i.e. whole tumor: WT). ROIs indicating tumor extent were separately defined on both FLAIR and, if applicable, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CE-T1WI), yielding four mean APTasym values (RS-FLAIR, WT-FLAIR, RS-CE-T1WI, and WT-CE-T1WI). The maximum values were also measured using small ROIs, and their differences among grades were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was also conducted on mean and maximum values. Intra-class correlation coefficients for inter-observer agreement were excellent. Significant differences were observed between high- and low-grade gliomas for all five methods (P < 0.01). ROC curve analysis found no statistically significant difference among them. This study clarifies that single-slice APT analysis is robust despite tumor heterogeneity, and can grade glial tumors with or without the use of contrast material.

摘要

酰胺质子转移(APT)磁共振成像因其对胶质肿瘤进行分级的能力而受到关注。通常,会分析一个代表性切片。先前的研究采用了不同的肿瘤区域定义。我们假设,APT成像对脑肿瘤分级的准确性可能取决于所使用的分析方法,例如感兴趣区域(ROI)的选择、单个或多个肿瘤切片,以及是否对侧白质进行归一化。本研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准,并豁免了书面知情同意书。26例经组织学证实的胶质肿瘤患者在术前采用三维梯度回波序列进行了APT成像。两名神经放射科医生通过在单个代表性切片(RS)和包括肿瘤的所有切片(即整个肿瘤:WT)上放置ROI,独立分析了APT不对称(APTasym)图像。在FLAIR图像上,以及在适用时在对比增强T1加权图像(CE-T1WI)上分别定义指示肿瘤范围的ROI,得出四个平均APTasym值(RS-FLAIR、WT-FLAIR、RS-CE-T1WI和WT-CE-T1WI)。还使用小ROI测量了最大值,并评估了不同分级之间的差异。还对平均值和最大值进行了受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析。观察者间一致性的组内相关系数极佳。所有五种方法在高级别和低级别胶质瘤之间均观察到显著差异(P < 0.01)。ROC曲线分析发现它们之间无统计学显著差异。本研究表明,尽管肿瘤具有异质性,但单切片APT分析仍然稳健,并且无论是否使用对比剂都可以对胶质肿瘤进行分级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验