Cottrell Elizabeth, Roddy Edward, Rathod Trishna, Thomas Elaine, Porcheret Mark, Foster Nadine E
Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Jan 6;15:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-15-3.
General Practitioners (GPs) respond poorly to postal surveys. Consequently there is potential for reduced data quality and bias in the findings. In general population surveys, response to postal questionnaires may be improved by reducing their length and offering incentives. The aim of this study was to investigate whether questionnaire length and/or the offer of an incentive improves the response of GPs to a postal questionnaire survey.
A postal questionnaire survey was sent to 800 UK GPs randomly selected from Binley's database; a database containing contact details of professionals working in UK general practices. The random sample of GPs was assigned to one of four groups of 200, each receiving a different questionnaire, either a standard (eight sides of A4) or an abbreviated (four sides of A4) questionnaire, with or without the offer of an incentive (a prize draw entry for a £100 voucher) for completion. The effects of questionnaire length and offer of incentive on response were calculated.
Of 800 mailed questionnaires, 19 GPs did not meet inclusion criteria and 172 (adjusted response 22.0%) completed questionnaires were received. Among the four groups, response ranged from 20.1% (standard questionnaire with no incentive and abbreviated questionnaire with incentive) through 21.8% (standard questionnaire with incentive), to 26.0% (abbreviated questionnaire with no incentive). There were no significant differences in response between the four groups (p = 0.447), between the groups receiving the standard versus the abbreviated questionnaire (% difference -2.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) -7.9, 3.7)) or the groups offered an incentive versus no incentive (% difference -2.1% (95% CI -7.9, 3.7).
Strategies known to improve response to postal questionnaire surveys in the general population do not significantly improve the response to postal questionnaire surveys among GPs. Further refinements to these strategies, or more novel strategies, aimed at increasing response specifically among GPs need to be identified in order to maximise data quality and generalisability of research results.
全科医生(GPs)对邮寄调查问卷的回复率很低。因此,存在数据质量下降和研究结果出现偏差的可能性。在一般人群调查中,通过缩短问卷长度和提供激励措施,可能会提高对邮寄问卷的回复率。本研究的目的是调查问卷长度和/或提供激励措施是否能提高全科医生对邮寄问卷调查的回复率。
向从宾利数据库中随机抽取的800名英国全科医生发送了一份邮寄问卷调查;该数据库包含在英国全科诊所工作的专业人员的联系方式。将随机抽取的全科医生样本分为四组,每组200人,每组收到不同的问卷,要么是标准问卷(A4纸八页),要么是简化问卷(A4纸四页),完成问卷后要么有激励措施(有机会抽奖赢取100英镑代金券),要么没有激励措施。计算问卷长度和激励措施对回复率的影响。
在800份邮寄问卷中,19名全科医生不符合纳入标准,共收到172份(调整后回复率22.0%)完成的问卷。在四组中,回复率从20.1%(无激励措施的标准问卷和有激励措施的简化问卷)到21.8%(有激励措施的标准问卷),再到26.0%(无激励措施的简化问卷)。四组之间的回复率没有显著差异(p = 0.447),收到标准问卷与简化问卷的组之间也没有显著差异(百分比差异-2.1%(95%置信区间(CI)-7.9,3.7)),提供激励措施组与未提供激励措施组之间也没有显著差异(百分比差异-2.1%(95%CI -7.9,3.7))。
已知的提高一般人群对邮寄问卷调查回复率的策略,并没有显著提高全科医生对邮寄问卷调查的回复率。需要确定对这些策略的进一步改进,或更新颖的策略,以专门提高全科医生的回复率,从而最大限度地提高数据质量和研究结果的普遍性。