Alsanabani Amal A M, Yusof Zamros Yuzadi Mohd, Wan Hassan Wan Nurazreena, Aldhorae Khalid, Alyamani Helmi A
Department of Community Oral Health and Clinical Prevention, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a 2124, Yemen.
Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 2;9(3):341. doi: 10.3390/children9030341.
Objectives: To shorten the 24-item Arabic Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ(A)) for adolescents in Yemen. Material and methods: Two shortening methods derived six-item and nine-item versions: the item impact method selected items with the highest impact scores as rated by 30 participants in each subscale; and the regression method was applied using data of 385 participants from the PIDAQ(A) validity study, with the total PIDAQ(A) score as the dependent variable, and its individual items as the independent variables. The four derived versions were assessed for validity and reliability. Results: The means of the six-item and nine-item short versions of both methods were close. Cronbach’s alpha values extended from 0.90 to 0.92 (intra-class correlations = 0.85−0.88). In criterion validity, strong significant correlations were detected between scores of all short versions and the 24-item PIDAQ(A) score (0.96−0.98; p < 0.001). Construct validity displayed significant associations among all short versions and self-perceived dental appearance rank and self-perceived need for orthodontic braces rank (p < 0.05). Mean scores of all short versions were significantly different between adolescents with severe malocclusion and those with slight malocclusion in discriminant validity tests. In conclusion, all PIDAQ(A) short versions are valid and reliable.
缩短适用于也门青少年的24项阿拉伯语牙科美学心理社会影响问卷(PIDAQ(A))。材料与方法:两种缩短方法得出了6项版和9项版:项目影响法选择了每个子量表中30名参与者评定的影响得分最高的项目;回归法则使用了来自PIDAQ(A)效度研究的385名参与者的数据,以PIDAQ(A)总分作为因变量,其各个项目作为自变量。对得出的四个版本进行效度和信度评估。结果:两种方法的6项和9项短版的均值相近。克朗巴哈系数值范围为0.90至0.92(组内相关系数 = 0.85−0.88)。在效标效度方面,所有短版得分与24项PIDAQ(A)得分之间均检测到强显著相关性(0.96−0.98;p < 0.001)。结构效度显示,所有短版与自我感知的牙齿外观排名以及自我感知的正畸矫治器需求排名之间均存在显著关联(p < 0.05)。在区分效度测试中,严重错颌青少年与轻度错颌青少年的所有短版平均得分存在显著差异。总之,所有PIDAQ(A)短版均有效且可靠。