• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免疫组织化学众包实验的初步结果。

Preliminary results from a crowdsourcing experiment in immunohistochemistry.

作者信息

Della Mea Vincenzo, Maddalena Eddy, Mizzaro Stefano, Machin Piernicola, Beltrami Carlo A

出版信息

Diagn Pathol. 2014;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-S1-S6. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1186/1746-1596-9-S1-S6
PMID:25565010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4305976/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Crowdsourcing, i.e., the outsourcing of tasks typically performed by a few experts to a large crowd as an open call, has been shown to be reasonably effective in many cases, like Wikipedia, the Chess match of Kasparov against the world in 1999, and several others. The aim of the present paper is to describe the setup of an experimentation of crowdsourcing techniques applied to the quantification of immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

Fourteen Images from MIB1-stained breast specimens were first manually counted by a pathologist, then submitted to a crowdsourcing platform through a specifically developed application. 10 positivity evaluations for each image have been collected and summarized using their median. The positivity values have been then compared to the gold standard provided by the pathologist by means of Spearman correlation.

RESULTS

Contributors were in total 28, and evaluated 4.64 images each on average. Spearman correlation between gold and crowdsourced positivity percentages is 0.946 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Aim of the experiment was to understand how to use crowdsourcing for an image analysis task that is currently time-consuming when done by human experts. Crowdsourced work can be used in various ways, in particular statistically agregating data to reduce identification errors. However, in this preliminary experimentation we just considered the most basic indicator, that is the median positivity percentage, which provided overall good results. This method might be more aimed to research than routine: when a large number of images are in need of ad-hoc evaluation, crowdsourcing may represent a quick answer to the need.

摘要

背景

众包,即将通常由少数专家执行的任务作为公开邀请外包给大量人群,在许多情况下已被证明相当有效,如维基百科、1999年卡斯帕罗夫与全球棋手的国际象棋比赛等。本文旨在描述将众包技术应用于免疫组织化学定量的实验设置。

方法

首先由一名病理学家对14张MIB1染色的乳腺标本图像进行手动计数,然后通过专门开发的应用程序提交到众包平台。对每张图像收集了10次阳性评估,并使用中位数进行汇总。然后通过斯皮尔曼相关性将阳性值与病理学家提供的金标准进行比较。

结果

贡献者共有28人,平均每人评估4.64张图像。金标准与众包阳性百分比之间的斯皮尔曼相关性为0.946(p < 0.001)。

结论

该实验的目的是了解如何将众包用于目前由人类专家完成时耗时的图像分析任务。众包工作可以通过多种方式使用,特别是通过统计聚合数据来减少识别错误。然而,在这个初步实验中,我们只考虑了最基本的指标,即中位数阳性百分比,其总体结果良好。这种方法可能更适用于研究而非常规工作:当需要对大量图像进行特殊评估时,众包可能是满足需求的快速解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/413b/4305976/2e54bb675508/1746-1596-9-S1-S6-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/413b/4305976/69eb09a3c72a/1746-1596-9-S1-S6-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/413b/4305976/f1b97527604b/1746-1596-9-S1-S6-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/413b/4305976/f98440aceb6a/1746-1596-9-S1-S6-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/413b/4305976/2e54bb675508/1746-1596-9-S1-S6-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/413b/4305976/69eb09a3c72a/1746-1596-9-S1-S6-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/413b/4305976/f1b97527604b/1746-1596-9-S1-S6-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/413b/4305976/f98440aceb6a/1746-1596-9-S1-S6-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/413b/4305976/2e54bb675508/1746-1596-9-S1-S6-4.jpg

相似文献

1
Preliminary results from a crowdsourcing experiment in immunohistochemistry.免疫组织化学众包实验的初步结果。
Diagn Pathol. 2014;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-S1-S6. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
2
Crowdsourcing image annotation for nucleus detection and segmentation in computational pathology: evaluating experts, automated methods, and the crowd.用于计算病理学中细胞核检测与分割的众包图像标注:评估专家、自动化方法及大众标注。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2015:294-305. doi: 10.1142/9789814644730_0029.
3
Crowdsourcing scoring of immunohistochemistry images: Evaluating Performance of the Crowd and an Automated Computational Method.众包免疫组化图像评分:评估人群和自动化计算方法的性能。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 23;7:43286. doi: 10.1038/srep43286.
4
Web 2.0-based crowdsourcing for high-quality gold standard development in clinical natural language processing.基于Web 2.0的众包方式用于临床自然语言处理中高质量金标准的开发。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 2;15(4):e73. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2426.
5
Is the crowd better as an assistant or a replacement in ontology engineering? An exploration through the lens of the Gene Ontology.在本体工程中,群体作为助手还是替代者更胜一筹?基于基因本体的视角探索。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Apr;60:199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
6
Crowds Replicate Performance of Scientific Experts Scoring Phylogenetic Matrices of Phenotypes.群体复制科学专家对表型系统发育矩阵评分的表现。
Syst Biol. 2018 Jan 1;67(1):49-60. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syx052.
7
Lessons Learned from Crowdsourcing Complex Engineering Tasks.从众包复杂工程任务中吸取的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0134978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134978. eCollection 2015.
8
Power of crowdsourcing: novel methods of data collection in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.众包的力量:银屑病和银屑病关节炎数据采集的新方法。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Dec;67(6):1273-1281.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.05.013. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
9
AggNet: Deep Learning From Crowds for Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images.AggNet:基于众包的深度学习方法在乳腺癌组织学图像有丝分裂检测中的应用。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 May;35(5):1313-21. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2528120. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
10
Crowdsourcing a normative natural language dataset: a comparison of Amazon Mechanical Turk and in-lab data collection.众包一个规范性自然语言数据集:亚马逊土耳其机器人与实验室数据收集的比较
J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 20;15(5):e100. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2620.

引用本文的文献

1
Task design for crowdsourced glioma cell annotation in microscopy images.众包显微镜图像中神经胶质瘤细胞注释的任务设计。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 23;14(1):1965. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51995-8.
2
Toward a generalizable machine learning workflow for neurodegenerative disease staging with focus on neurofibrillary tangles.针对神经退行性疾病分期的可推广机器学习工作流程研究,重点关注神经纤维缠结。
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2023 Dec 18;11(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s40478-023-01691-x.
3
Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Outcomes Associated with Student Engagement in a Novel Brain Chemoarchitecture Mapping Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Crowdsourcing as a novel technique for retinal fundus photography classification: analysis of images in the EPIC Norfolk cohort on behalf of the UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium.众包作为一种新的眼底照相分类技术:代表英国生物银行眼与视觉联盟对 EPIC Norfolk 队列中的图像进行分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 21;8(8):e71154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071154. eCollection 2013.
2
Ki-67 is a prognostic parameter in breast cancer patients: results of a large population-based cohort of a cancer registry.Ki-67 是乳腺癌患者的预后参数:癌症登记处的一项大型基于人群队列研究的结果。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jun;139(2):539-52. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2560-8. Epub 2013 May 16.
3
与学生参与基于新型脑化学结构映射课程的本科研究经历相关的认知和非认知成果。
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2019 Dec 21;18(1):A15-A43. eCollection 2019 Fall.
4
Crowdsourcing scoring of immunohistochemistry images: Evaluating Performance of the Crowd and an Automated Computational Method.众包免疫组化图像评分:评估人群和自动化计算方法的性能。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 23;7:43286. doi: 10.1038/srep43286.
5
Defining Glioblastoma Resectability Through the Wisdom of the Crowd: A Proof-of-Principle Study.通过群体智慧定义胶质母细胞瘤的可切除性:一项原理验证研究。
Neurosurgery. 2017 Apr 1;80(4):590-601. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001374.
6
Real alerts and artifact classification in archived multi-signal vital sign monitoring data: implications for mining big data.存档多信号生命体征监测数据中的真实警报与伪迹分类:对大数据挖掘的启示
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Dec;30(6):875-888. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9788-2. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
Crowdsourcing malaria parasite quantification: an online game for analyzing images of infected thick blood smears.
众包疟原虫定量:一款用于分析感染厚血涂片图像的在线游戏。
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 29;14(6):e167. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2338.
4
Comparison of the effect of different techniques for measurement of Ki67 proliferation on reproducibility and prognosis prediction accuracy in breast cancer.比较不同 Ki67 增殖检测技术在乳腺癌中的重复性和预后预测准确性的效果。
Histopathology. 2012 Dec;61(6):1134-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04329.x. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
5
Distributed human intelligence for colonic polyp classification in computer-aided detection for CT colonography.用于 CT 结肠成像中计算机辅助检测的结肠息肉分类的分布式人体智能。
Radiology. 2012 Mar;262(3):824-33. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110938. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
6
Comparison of visual and automated assessment of Ki-67 proliferative activity and their impact on outcome in primary operable invasive ductal breast cancer.原发性可手术浸润性导管乳腺癌中 Ki-67 增殖活性的视觉评估与自动评估及其对预后的影响比较。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Jan 17;106(2):383-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.569. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
7
Proliferative activity in human breast cancer: Ki-67 automated evaluation and the influence of different Ki-67 equivalent antibodies.人类乳腺癌的增殖活性:Ki-67 自动评估及不同 Ki-67 等价抗体的影响。
Diagn Pathol. 2011 Mar 30;6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-6-S1-S7.