Evans E W, Jacques P F, Dallal G E, Sacheck J, Must A
Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, Brown University Medical School, Providence, RI, USA.
Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Pediatr Obes. 2015 Dec;10(6):442-7. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12004. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
The role of eating frequency on relative weight in childhood is not well understood.
To clarify this relationship by assessing the cross-sectional and prospective relationships of weekday eating frequency with BMI z-score (BMIz) and change in BMIz in a sample of schoolchildren.
Eating frequency, the average number of reported daily eating occasions, was assessed using two weekday 24-h diet recalls. BMIz was measured at baseline, 6 months and 1 year in 155 urban schoolchildren, ages 9-15 years. Multiple linear regression models were used.
Cross-sectional analyses at baseline suggest that BMIz was 0.23 units lower for each additional reported eating occasion (regression coefficient = -0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.44, -0.07). From baseline to 6 months, BMIz increased by 0.03 units for each additional reported eating occasion (regression coefficient = 0.03; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.05). This relationship was no longer statistically significant at 1 year (regression coefficient = 0.01; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.03).
The findings suggest that the relationship of eating frequency with BMIz differs from that of change in BMIz. This difference may be due to methodological deficiencies of cross-sectional studies, challenges of dietary assessment or differences in eating patterns among normal and overweight youth. Controlled trials are needed to further clarify this relationship.
饮食频率对儿童相对体重的作用尚未得到充分理解。
通过评估工作日饮食频率与BMI z评分(BMIz)之间的横断面和前瞻性关系以及在校儿童样本中BMIz的变化,来阐明这种关系。
使用两次工作日24小时饮食回忆法评估饮食频率,即报告的每日饮食次数的平均值。对155名9至15岁的城市在校儿童在基线、6个月和1年时测量BMIz。采用多元线性回归模型。
基线时的横断面分析表明,每增加一次报告的饮食次数,BMIz降低0.23个单位(回归系数 = -0.23;95%置信区间[CI]:-0.44,-0.07)。从基线到6个月,每增加一次报告的饮食次数,BMIz增加0.03个单位(回归系数 = 0.03;95%CI:0.01,0.05)。这种关系在1年时不再具有统计学意义(回归系数 = 0.01;95%CI:-0.01,0.03)。
研究结果表明,饮食频率与BMIz的关系不同于BMIz的变化。这种差异可能是由于横断面研究的方法缺陷、饮食评估的挑战或正常和超重青少年饮食模式的差异。需要进行对照试验以进一步阐明这种关系。