Ecole de santé publique, Université de Montréal, PO Box 6128, Downtown Station, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3C 3J7.
Public Health Nutr. 2010 Feb;13(2):163-71. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009990711. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
To understand more specifically how the quality, quantity and frequency of snack food consumption differs in different BMI categories.
Four hundred and forty-nine school-aged children (grade 4-6) from a Kanien'kehaka (Mohawk) community provided a 24 h recall and their height and weight in 1994, 1998 and 2002, in three independent cross-sectional samples. Food consumed between two consecutive meals was defined as a snacking occasion. ANOVA and chi2 tests were used to compare food choices between BMI categories according to food quality criteria and food groups in 2006. Logistic regression models were performed to compare results between normal-weight children and those at risk of overweight and between normal-weight and overweight children.
Energy intake from snacks tended to be higher for children at risk of overweight, compared with the other two BMI categories. Food groups with a higher energy density were also consumed more frequently by these children, with larger average portions of cereal bars (P < 0.05). Except for dessert consumption, which was less frequent among overweight children, no other variable distinguished risk of overweight in the two logistic regression models tested.
Differences detected in snack food intake between normal-weight children and children at risk of overweight could explain in part the relationship between food choices and risk of overweight. Studies of dietary differences in conjunction with body weight would benefit from considering children at risk of overweight and normal-weight children, rather than children with excess weight only.
更具体地了解不同 BMI 类别中零食的质量、数量和频率的差异。
1994 年、1998 年和 2002 年,来自一个卡尼涅克(莫霍克)社区的 449 名学龄儿童(4-6 年级)提供了 24 小时回忆,并在三个独立的横断面样本中测量了他们的身高和体重。两餐之间食用的食物被定义为零食。根据 2006 年的食物质量标准和食物组,使用 ANOVA 和 chi2 检验比较 BMI 类别之间的食物选择。进行逻辑回归模型比较正常体重儿童与超重风险儿童以及正常体重儿童与超重儿童之间的结果。
与其他两个 BMI 类别相比,超重风险儿童的零食能量摄入往往较高。这些儿童也更频繁地食用能量密度较高的食物组,谷物棒的平均份量更大(P < 0.05)。除了超重儿童的甜点消费频率较低外,两个逻辑回归模型中没有其他变量可以区分超重风险。
在正常体重儿童和超重风险儿童之间检测到的零食摄入差异可以部分解释食物选择与超重风险之间的关系。与体重相关的饮食差异研究应考虑超重风险和正常体重儿童,而不仅仅是超重儿童。