UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland.
Institute of Sport Sciences, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Apr;49(7):434-40. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093885. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
The aim was to assess the quality and strength of evidence for the health benefits of specific sport disciplines. Electronic search yielded 2194 records and the selection resulted in 69 eligible studies (47 cross-sectional, 9 cohort, 13 intervention studies). 105 comparisons between participation and non-participation groups in 26 different sport disciplines were reported. Moderately strong evidence showed that both running and football improve aerobic fitness and cardiovascular function at rest, and football reduces adiposity. Conditional evidence showed that running benefits metabolic fitness, adiposity and postural balance, and football improves metabolic fitness, muscular performance, postural balance, and cardiac function. Evidence for health benefits of other sport disciplines was either inconclusive or tenuous. The evidence base for the health benefits of specific sports disciplines is generally compromised by weak study design and quality. Future research should address the health effects of different sport disciplines using rigorous research designs.
目的在于评估特定运动项目对健康益处的证据的质量和强度。电子检索产生了 2194 条记录,选择后得到了 69 项合格的研究(47 项横断面研究、9 项队列研究、13 项干预研究)。报告了 26 种不同运动项目中参与和不参与组之间的 105 项比较。有中等强度的证据表明,跑步和足球都能提高静息时的有氧健身和心血管功能,足球能降低肥胖率。条件性证据表明,跑步有益于代谢健康、肥胖和姿势平衡,足球则能改善代谢健康、肌肉表现、姿势平衡和心脏功能。其他运动项目对健康益处的证据要么不确定,要么薄弱。特定运动项目对健康益处的证据基础通常因研究设计和质量薄弱而受到影响。未来的研究应该使用严格的研究设计来解决不同运动项目的健康影响问题。