Choudhary P, Hsu C J, Grieve S, Smillie C, Singarayar S, Semsarian C, Richmond D, Muthurangu V, Celermajer D S, Puranik R
The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Sydney, Australia.
The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Sydney, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Feb 15;181:430-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.053. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
Current diagnostic criteria for left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) poorly correlate with clinical outcomes. We aimed to develop a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) based semi-automated technique for quantification of non-compacted (NC) and compacted (C) masses and to ascertain their relationships to global and regional LV function.
We analysed CMR data from 30 adults with isolated LVNC and 20 controls. NC and C masses were measured using relative signal intensities of myocardium and blood pool. Global and regional LVNC masses was calculated and correlated with both global and regional LV systolic function as well as occurrence of arrhythmia.
LVNC patients had significantly higher end-systolic (ES) and end-diastolic (ED) NC:C ratios compared to controls (ES 0.21 [SD 0.09] vs. 0.12 [SD 0.02], p<0.001; ED 0.39 [SD 0.08] vs. 0.26 [SD 0.05], p<0.001). NC:C ratios correlated inversely with global ejection fraction, with a stronger correlation in ES vs. ED (r=-0.58, p<0.001 vs. r=-0.30, p=0.03). ES basal, mid and apical NC:C ratios also showed a significant inverse correlation with global LV ejection fraction (ES basal r=-0.29, p=0.04; mid-ventricular r=-0.50, p<0.001 and apical r=-0.71, p<0.001). Upon ROC testing, an ES NC:C ratio of 0.16 had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 95% for detection of significant LVNC. Patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia had a significantly higher ES NC:C ratio (0.31 [SD 0.18] vs. 0.20 [SD 0.06], p=0.02).
The NC:C ratio derived from relative signal intensities of myocardium and blood pool improves the ability to detect clinically relevant NC compared to previous CMR techniques.
目前左心室心肌致密化不全(LVNC)的诊断标准与临床结局的相关性较差。我们旨在开发一种基于心脏磁共振成像(CMR)的半自动技术,用于量化非致密化(NC)和致密化(C)心肌质量,并确定它们与左心室整体和局部功能的关系。
我们分析了30例孤立性LVNC成人患者和20例对照者的CMR数据。使用心肌和血池的相对信号强度测量NC和C心肌质量。计算左心室整体和局部的NC质量,并将其与左心室整体和局部收缩功能以及心律失常的发生情况进行相关性分析。
与对照组相比,LVNC患者的收缩末期(ES)和舒张末期(ED)NC:C比值显著更高(ES 0.21[标准差0.09]对0.12[标准差0.02],p<0.001;ED 0.39[标准差0.08]对0.26[标准差0.05],p<0.001)。NC:C比值与整体射血分数呈负相关,ES期的相关性强于ED期(r=-0.58,p<0.001对r=-0.30,p=0.03)。ES期基底段、中间段和心尖段的NC:C比值也与左心室整体射血分数呈显著负相关(ES期基底段r=-0.29,p=0.04;心室中段r=-0.50,p<0.001;心尖段r=-0.71,p<0.001)。经ROC检测,ES期NC:C比值为0.16时,检测显著LVNC的敏感性为70%,特异性为95%。持续性室性心动过速患者的ES期NC:C比值显著更高(0.31[标准差0.18]对0.20[标准差0.06],p=0.02)。
与以往的CMR技术相比,基于心肌和血池相对信号强度得出的NC:C比值提高了检测临床相关NC的能力。