Choi Yeonu, Kim Sung Mok, Lee Sang-Chol, Chang Sung-A, Jang Shin Yi, Choe Yeon Hyeon
Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
HVSI Imaging Center, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 May 4;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0245-2.
Left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) is an unclassified cardiomyopathy and there is no consensus on the diagnosis of LVNC. The aims of this study were to establish quantitative methods to diagnose LVNC using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and to suggest refined semi-quantitative methods to diagnose LVNC.
This retrospective study included 145 subjects with mild to severe trabeculation of the left ventricle myocardium [24 patients with isolated LVNC, 33 patients with non-isolated LVNC, 30 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with non-compaction (DCMNC), 27 patients with DCM, and 31 healthy control subjects with mild trabeculation]. The left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, global LV myocardial volume, trabeculated LV myocardial volume, and number of segments with late gadolinium enhancement were measured. In addition, the most prominent non-compacted (NC), compacted (C), normal mid-septum, normal mid-lateral wall, and apical trabeculation thicknesses on the end-diastolic frames of the long-axis slices were measured.
In the patients with isolated LVNC, the percentage of trabeculated LV volume (TV%, 42.6 ± 13.8 %) relative to total LV myocardial volume was 1.4 times higher than in those with DCM (30.3 ± 14.3 %, p < 0.001), and 1.7 times higher than in the controls (24.8 ± 7.1 %, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in TV% between the isolated LVNC and DCMNC groups (47.1 ± 17.3 % in the DCMNC group; p = 0.210). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis using Jenni's method for CMR classification as the standard diagnostic criteria revealed that a value of TV% above 34.6 % was predictive of NC with a specificity of 89.7 % (CI: 74.2 - 98.0 %) and a sensitivity of 66.1 % (CI: 52.6 - 77.9 %). A value of NC/septum over 1.27 was considered predictive for NC with a specificity of 82.8 % (CI: 64.2 - 94.2 %) and a sensitivity of 57.6 % (CI: 44.1 - 70.4 %). In addition, a value of apex/C above 3.15 was considered predictive of NC with a specificity of 93.1 % (CI: 77.2 - 99.2 %) and a sensitivity of 69.5 % (CI: 56.1 - 80.8 %).
A trabeculated LV myocardial volume above 35 % of the total LV myocardial volume is diagnostic for LVNC with high specificity. Also, the apex/C and NC/septum ratios could be useful as supplementary diagnostic criteria.
左心室心肌致密化不全(LVNC)是一种未分类的心肌病,目前对于LVNC的诊断尚无共识。本研究的目的是建立使用心血管磁共振(CMR)诊断LVNC的定量方法,并提出更精确的LVNC半定量诊断方法。
本回顾性研究纳入了145例左心室心肌小梁化程度从轻到重的受试者[24例孤立性LVNC患者、33例非孤立性LVNC患者、30例伴有心肌致密化不全的扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者、27例DCM患者以及31例心肌小梁化程度较轻的健康对照者]。测量左心室(LV)射血分数、左心室整体心肌体积、小梁化左心室心肌体积以及延迟钆增强节段数。此外,还测量了长轴切片舒张末期帧上最突出的非致密化(NC)、致密化(C)、正常室间隔中部、正常室侧壁中部以及心尖小梁厚度。
在孤立性LVNC患者中,小梁化左心室体积(TV%,42.6±13.8%)相对于左心室整体心肌体积的百分比比DCM患者(30.3±14. 3%,p<0.001)高1.4倍,比对照组(24.8±7.1%,p<0.001)高1.7倍。然而,孤立性LVNC组与DCM合并心肌致密化不全(DCMNC)组之间的TV%无显著差异(DCMNC组为47.1±17.3%;p=0.210)。以Jenni法进行CMR分类作为标准诊断标准的受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,TV%值高于34.6%对心肌致密化不全具有预测性,特异性为89.7%(CI:74.2 - 98.0%)及敏感性为66.1%(CI:52.6 - 77.9%)。NC/室间隔值超过1.27被认为对心肌致密化不全具有预测性,特异性为82.8%(CI:64.2 - 94.2%)及敏感性为57.6%(CI:44.1 - 70.4%)。此外,心尖/C值高于3.15被认为对心肌致密化不全具有预测性,特异性为93.1%(CI:77.2 - 99.2%)及敏感性为69.5%(CI:56.1 - 80.8%)。
小梁化左心室心肌体积超过左心室整体心肌体积的35%对LVNC具有高特异性诊断价值。此外,心尖/C和NC/室间隔比值可作为辅助诊断标准。