Tarando Fanny, Coisne Damien, Galli Elena, Rousseau Chloé, Viera Frédéric, Bosseau Christian, Habib Gilbert, Lederlin Mathieu, Schnell Frédéric, Donal Erwan
Service de Cardiologie and CIC-IT 1414, Hôpital Pontchaillou - CHU Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France.
Service d'Imagerie médicale, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jan;33(1):83-95. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0980-3. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
Left ventricular non-compaction (LV NC) is characterized by abnormal trabeculations that are mainly at the LV apex. Distinction between LV NC and non-specific dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMs) remains often challenging. We sought to find additive tools comparing the longitudinal strain characteristics of LVNC versus idiopathic DCM in a cohort of patients. 48 cases of LVNC (derivation cohort) were compared with 45 cases of DCM. Global and regional multi-layer (sub-endocardial, mid-wall, and sub-epicardial) LV longitudinal strain analysis was performed. Results were compared to define the best tool for distinguishing LVNC from DCM. A validation cohort (41 LVNC patients) was then used to assess the performance of the proposed diagnostic tools. In the derivation cohort, longitudinal deformation (strain) was greater in LVNC than in DCM patients. Longitudinal shortening was greater in the non-compacted segments than in the compacted ones. A mid-wall strain base-apex gradient had 88.4 % sensitivity and 66.7 % specificity in distinguishing LVNC from DCM (AUC = 0.83; cut-off of -23 or |0.23|%). In a multivariable model, the base-apex mid-wall gradient in an apical 4-chamber view was the only independent echocardiographic criteria (OR = 0.76, CI 95 % [0.66; 0.90], p = 0.0010) allowing the distinction between LVNC and DCM. In the validation cohort, the base-apex mid-wall gradient of strain had 88.4 % sensitivity, 85.7 % negative predictive values for the diagnosis of LVNC. Longitudinal strain, especially the base-apex longitudinal gradient of strain, appears as an additive valuable tool for distinguishing LVNC from DCM.
左心室心肌致密化不全(LV NC)的特征是主要位于左心室心尖部的异常肌小梁。区分LV NC与非特异性扩张型心肌病(DCM)通常仍具有挑战性。我们试图寻找辅助工具,以比较一组患者中LV NC与特发性DCM的纵向应变特征。将48例LV NC患者(推导队列)与45例DCM患者进行比较。进行了整体和局部多层(心内膜下、心肌中层和心外膜下)左心室纵向应变分析。比较结果以确定区分LV NC与DCM的最佳工具。然后使用一个验证队列(41例LV NC患者)来评估所提出诊断工具的性能。在推导队列中,LV NC患者的纵向变形(应变)大于DCM患者。非致密化节段的纵向缩短大于致密化节段。心肌中层应变基底部-心尖部梯度在区分LV NC与DCM时具有88.4%的敏感性和66.7%的特异性(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.83;截断值为-23或|0.23|%)。在多变量模型中,心尖四腔视图中的基底部-心尖部心肌中层梯度是唯一能够区分LV NC与DCM的独立超声心动图标准(比值比[OR]=0.76,95%置信区间[CI][0.66;0.90],p=0.0010)。在验证队列中,应变的基底部-心尖部心肌中层梯度对LV NC诊断的敏感性为88.4%,阴性预测值为85.7%。纵向应变,尤其是应变的基底部-心尖部纵向梯度,似乎是区分LV NC与DCM的一种有价值的辅助工具。