Suppr超能文献

降压治疗对高血压患者传导系统疾病发病的影响。

Effect of antihypertensive therapy on development of incident conduction system disease in hypertensive patients.

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

University of Oslo, Ullevål Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2019 Mar;37(3):629-635. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001915.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous work has demonstrated that treatment of hypertensive patients with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril was associated with a reduced incidence of a composite conduction system disease endpoint and also left bundle branch block (LBBB) compared with chlorthalidone therapy. The relationship of incident conduction system disease to angiotensin receptor blocker therapy has not been examined.

METHODS

Risk of new right (RBBB) or LBBB in relation to losartan-based vs. atenolol-based treatment was assessed in 8342 hypertensive patients without baseline RBBB or LBBB. Risk of incident intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD), defined as new QRS duration at least 110 ms was assessed in the 7110 patient subset who also had baseline QRS duration less than 110 ms. QRS duration and BBB were determined on in-study ECGs done at 6 months, 1 year and then yearly.

RESULTS

During 4.8 ± 1.0 years follow-up, 459 patients developed new LBBB (5.5%), 184 (2.2) new RBBB and 1173 (16.5%) a new IVCD. In univariate Cox analyses, losartan-based treatment was not associated with a significantly reduced risk of either new LBBB (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.79-1.14, P = 0.583) or RBBB (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.76-1.36, P = 0.903), but resulted in a 15% lower risk of new IVCD (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.95, P = 0.005). In a multivariable Cox model that adjusted for other statistically significant predictors of incident IVCD in this population (age, sex, race, history of ischemic heart disease, MI, heart failure, diabetes or atrial fibrillation, prior antihypertensive treatment, baseline total and HDL cholesterol, serum glucose and creatinine and baseline QRS duration as standard covariates and incident MI and on-treatment systolic and diastolic pressure, BMI and Cornell voltage as time-dependent covariates), losartan treatment remained associated with a 13% lower risk of new IVCD (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.98, P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Incident IVCD, but not BBB, is significantly reduced by losartan-based treatment. Further study is warranted to assess the potential differential impact of this therapy on QRS prolongation vs. development of more discrete conduction system block.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,与氯噻酮治疗相比,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂赖诺普利治疗高血压患者可降低复合传导系统疾病终点和左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的发生率。尚未检查血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗与新发传导系统疾病的关系。

方法

在 8342 名无基线 RBBB 或 LBBB 的高血压患者中,评估基于洛沙坦与基于阿替洛尔的治疗新发右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)或 LBBB 的风险。在基线 QRS 持续时间小于 110ms 的 7110 例患者亚组中,评估新发室内传导延迟(IVCD)的风险,定义为新 QRS 持续时间至少为 110ms。在研究期间的 6 个月、1 年和每年进行 ECG 检查以确定 QRS 持续时间和 BBB。

结果

在 4.8±1.0 年的随访中,459 例患者新发 LBBB(5.5%),184 例(2.2%)新发 RBBB,1173 例(16.5%)新发 IVCD。在单变量 Cox 分析中,基于洛沙坦的治疗与新发 LBBB 的风险降低无显著相关性(风险比 0.95,95%CI 0.79-1.14,P=0.583)或新发 RBBB(风险比 1.02,95%CI 0.76-1.36,P=0.903),但新发 IVCD 的风险降低了 15%(风险比 0.85,95%CI 0.76-0.95,P=0.005)。在多变量 Cox 模型中,该模型调整了该人群中 IVCD 新发的其他统计学上显著的预测因素(年龄、性别、种族、缺血性心脏病史、心肌梗死、心力衰竭、糖尿病或心房颤动、既往降压治疗、基线总胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、血清葡萄糖和肌酐以及基线 QRS 持续时间作为标准协变量和新发心肌梗死以及治疗期间的收缩压和舒张压、体重指数和康奈尔电压作为时间依赖性协变量),基于洛沙坦的治疗仍与新发 IVCD 的风险降低 13%相关(风险比 0.87,95%CI 0.77-0.98,P=0.021)。

结论

基于洛沙坦的治疗可显著降低新发 IVCD,但不能降低 BBB。需要进一步研究评估这种治疗对 QRS 延长与更离散的传导系统阻滞发展的潜在差异影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验