• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护国家审计与研究中心评分系统在英国成人心脏手术人群中的验证

Validation of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Scoring System in a UK Adult Cardiac Surgery Population.

作者信息

Ariyaratnam Priyadharshanan, Loubani Mahmoud, Biddulph James, Moore Julie, Richards Neil, Chaudhry Mubarak, Hong Vincent, Haworth Mark, Ananthasayanam Anantha

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(3):565-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.09.013. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2014.09.013
PMID:25575409
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) scoring system was conceived in 2007, utilizing 12 physiologic variables taken from the first 24 hours of adult admissions to the general intensive care unit (ICU) to predict in-hospital mortality. The authors aimed to evaluate the ICNARC score in predicting mortality in cardiac surgical patients compared to established cardiac risk models such as logistic EuroSCORE as well as to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively.

SETTING

Single-center study in a cardiac intensive care in a regional cardiothoracic center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 2010 and June 2012.

METHODS

A total of 1,646 patients were scored preoperatively using the logistic EuroSCORE and postoperatively using ICNARC and APACHE II. Data for comparison of scoring systems are presented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The mean age at surgery was 67 years±10.1. The mortality from all cardiac surgery was 3.2%. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 7.31±10.13, the mean ICNARC score was 13.42±5.055, while the mean APACHE II score was 6.32±7.731. The c-indices for logistic EuroSCORE, ICNARC, and APACHE II were 0.801, 0.847 and 0.648, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The authors have, for the first time, validated the ICNARC score as a useful predictor of postoperative mortality in adult cardiac surgical patients. This could have implications for postoperative management, focusing the utilization of resources as well as a method to measure and compare performance in the cardiothoracic ICU.

摘要

目的

重症监护国家审计与研究中心(ICNARC)评分系统于2007年构思而成,利用从成年患者入住综合重症监护病房(ICU)的头24小时获取的12项生理变量来预测院内死亡率。作者旨在评估ICNARC评分在预测心脏手术患者死亡率方面与已确立的心脏风险模型(如逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(logistic EuroSCORE))以及急性生理与慢性健康状况评估系统(APACHE)II相比的效果。

设计

对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。

地点

某地区心胸中心心脏重症监护病房的单中心研究。

参与者

2010年1月至2012年6月期间接受心脏手术的患者。

方法

总共1646例患者术前使用逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统进行评分,术后使用ICNARC和APACHE II进行评分。评分系统比较的数据以受试者工作特征曲线下面积表示。

测量指标及主要结果

手术时的平均年龄为67岁±10.1岁。所有心脏手术的死亡率为3.2%。逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统的平均评分为7.31±10.13,ICNARC的平均评分为13.42±5.055,而APACHE II的平均评分为6.32±7.731。逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统、ICNARC和APACHE II的c指数分别为0.801、0.847和0.648。

结论

作者首次验证了ICNARC评分可作为成年心脏手术患者术后死亡率的有效预测指标。这可能对术后管理、资源利用的重点以及心胸ICU中衡量和比较绩效的方法产生影响。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Scoring System in a UK Adult Cardiac Surgery Population.重症监护国家审计与研究中心评分系统在英国成人心脏手术人群中的验证
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(3):565-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.09.013. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
2
Validation of Cardiac Surgery Score (CASUS) in Postoperative Cardiac Patients.心脏手术评分(CASUS)在心脏术后患者中的验证。
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Dec;24(4):304-312. doi: 10.1177/1089253220936786. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
3
Implementation of EuroSCORE II as an adjunct to APACHE II model and SOFA score, for refining the prognostic accuracy in cardiac surgical patients.实施欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)作为急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)模型和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的辅助工具,以提高心脏手术患者预后评估的准确性。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Dec;56(6):919-27. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
4
Prediction of Postoperative Outcomes and Long-Term Survival in Cardiac Surgical Patients Using the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Score.使用重症监护国家审计与研究中心评分预测心脏外科患者的术后结局和长期生存。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Nov;33(11):3022-3027. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.05.034. Epub 2019 May 27.
5
Mortality prediction after cardiac surgery: blood lactate is indispensible.心脏手术后的死亡率预测:血乳酸必不可少。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;61(8):708-17. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1324796. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
6
Verification of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit.香港一间重症监护病房中急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估评分系统的验证
Crit Care Med. 1993 May;21(5):698-705. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199305000-00013.
7
Consecutive Observational Study to Validate EuroSCORE II Performances on a Single-Center, Contemporary Cardiac Surgical Cohort.一项在单中心当代心脏外科队列中验证欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)性能的连续性观察研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Apr;30(2):345-51. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
8
Scoring Systems for Outcome Prediction in a Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Comparative Study.心脏外科重症监护病房预后预测评分系统:一项比较研究
Am J Crit Care. 2015 Jul;24(4):327-34; quiz 335. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015500.
9
Difficulties in predicting outcome in cardiac surgery patients.预测心脏手术患者预后的困难。
Crit Care Med. 1995 Nov;23(11):1843-50. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199511000-00010.
10
Daily assessment of organ dysfunction and survival in intensive care unit cardiac surgical patients.重症监护病房心脏手术患者器官功能障碍及生存情况的每日评估
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 May;79(5):1555-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.10.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Is APACHE II a useful tool for clinical research?急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)是临床研究的有用工具吗?
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Jul-Sep;29(3):264-267. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170046.