Ariyaratnam Priyadharshanan, Loubani Mahmoud, Biddulph James, Moore Julie, Richards Neil, Chaudhry Mubarak, Hong Vincent, Haworth Mark, Ananthasayanam Anantha
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(3):565-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.09.013. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
The Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) scoring system was conceived in 2007, utilizing 12 physiologic variables taken from the first 24 hours of adult admissions to the general intensive care unit (ICU) to predict in-hospital mortality. The authors aimed to evaluate the ICNARC score in predicting mortality in cardiac surgical patients compared to established cardiac risk models such as logistic EuroSCORE as well as to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II.
Retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively.
Single-center study in a cardiac intensive care in a regional cardiothoracic center.
Patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 2010 and June 2012.
A total of 1,646 patients were scored preoperatively using the logistic EuroSCORE and postoperatively using ICNARC and APACHE II. Data for comparison of scoring systems are presented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
The mean age at surgery was 67 years±10.1. The mortality from all cardiac surgery was 3.2%. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 7.31±10.13, the mean ICNARC score was 13.42±5.055, while the mean APACHE II score was 6.32±7.731. The c-indices for logistic EuroSCORE, ICNARC, and APACHE II were 0.801, 0.847 and 0.648, respectively.
The authors have, for the first time, validated the ICNARC score as a useful predictor of postoperative mortality in adult cardiac surgical patients. This could have implications for postoperative management, focusing the utilization of resources as well as a method to measure and compare performance in the cardiothoracic ICU.
重症监护国家审计与研究中心(ICNARC)评分系统于2007年构思而成,利用从成年患者入住综合重症监护病房(ICU)的头24小时获取的12项生理变量来预测院内死亡率。作者旨在评估ICNARC评分在预测心脏手术患者死亡率方面与已确立的心脏风险模型(如逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(logistic EuroSCORE))以及急性生理与慢性健康状况评估系统(APACHE)II相比的效果。
对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。
某地区心胸中心心脏重症监护病房的单中心研究。
2010年1月至2012年6月期间接受心脏手术的患者。
总共1646例患者术前使用逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统进行评分,术后使用ICNARC和APACHE II进行评分。评分系统比较的数据以受试者工作特征曲线下面积表示。
手术时的平均年龄为67岁±10.1岁。所有心脏手术的死亡率为3.2%。逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统的平均评分为7.31±10.13,ICNARC的平均评分为13.42±5.055,而APACHE II的平均评分为6.32±7.731。逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统、ICNARC和APACHE II的c指数分别为0.801、0.847和0.648。
作者首次验证了ICNARC评分可作为成年心脏手术患者术后死亡率的有效预测指标。这可能对术后管理、资源利用的重点以及心胸ICU中衡量和比较绩效的方法产生影响。