Mo Yenan, Liu Xusheng, Qin Xindong, Huang Jing, He Zhiren, Lin Junjie, Hu Qinqing, Cai Youqing, Liu Zhuangzhu, Wang Lixin
The Second Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.
Nephropathy Department, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:279853. doi: 10.1155/2014/279853. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Shenfu injection (SFI) for intradialytic hypotension (IDH). Methods. A systematic review of data sources published as of April 2014 was conducted. These included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2014 issue 4), Pubmed, Embase, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wangfang Data. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving SFI for treatment and prevention of IDH were identified. Two researchers independently selected articles, extracted data, assessed quality, and cross checked the results. Revman 5.2 was used to analyze the results. Results. Eight RCTs were included. The meta-analysis indicated that compared with conventional therapies alone, SFI could elevate systolic blood pressure (SBP), increase the clinical effective rate, decrease the incidence of hypotension, increase serum albumin (ALB) levels, and reduce C-reactive protein (CRP) levels without serious adverse effects. GRADE Quality of Evidence. the quality of SBP, the effective rate, ALB, and CRP were low, and hypotension incidence and DBP were very low. Conclusions. SFI is more effective than conventional therapies for prevention and treatment of IDH. However, a clinical recommendation is not warranted due to the small number of studies included and low methodology quality. Multi-center and high-quality RCTs with large sample sizes are needed to provide stronger evidence.
目的。评估参附注射液(SFI)治疗透析中低血压(IDH)的有效性和安全性。方法。对截至2014年4月发表的数据源进行系统评价。这些数据源包括Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(2014年第4期)、Pubmed、Embase、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国知网(CNKI)、维普资讯(VIP)和万方数据。纳入涉及SFI治疗和预防IDH的随机对照试验(RCT)。两名研究人员独立筛选文章、提取数据、评估质量并核对结果。使用Revman 5.2分析结果。结果。纳入8项RCT。荟萃分析表明,与单纯传统疗法相比,SFI可提高收缩压(SBP)、提高临床有效率、降低低血压发生率、提高血清白蛋白(ALB)水平并降低C反应蛋白(CRP)水平,且无严重不良反应。证据质量分级。SBP、有效率、ALB和CRP的证据质量低,低血压发生率和舒张压(DBP)的证据质量非常低。结论。SFI在预防和治疗IDH方面比传统疗法更有效。然而,由于纳入研究数量少且方法学质量低,故不做临床推荐。需要开展多中心、大样本量的高质量RCT以提供更有力的证据。