Tannure Meire Chucre, Salgado Patrícia de Oliveira, Chianca Tânia Couto Machado
MG, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Departamento de Medicina e Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brasil.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2014 Nov-Dec;67(6):972-8. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167.2014670616. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
This descriptive study aimed at elaborating nursing diagnostic labels according to ICNP®; conducting a cross-mapping between the diagnostic formulations and the diagnostic labels of NANDA-I; identifying the diagnostic labels thus obtained that were also listed in the NANDA-I; and mapping them according to Basic Human Needs. The workshop technique was applied to 32 intensive care nurses, the cross-mapping and validation based on agreement with experts. The workshop produced 1665 diagnostic labels which were further refined into 120 labels. They were then submitted to a cross-mapping process with both NANDA-I diagnostic labels and the Basic Human Needs. The mapping results underwent content validation by two expert nurses leading to concordance rates of 92% and 100%. It was found that 63 labels were listed in NANDA-I and 47 were not.
这项描述性研究旨在根据国际护理实践分类法（ICNP®）阐述护理诊断标签；在诊断表述与北美护理诊断协会（NANDA - I）的诊断标签之间进行交叉映射；识别那些也被列入NANDA - I的由此获得的诊断标签；并根据基本人类需求对它们进行映射。研讨班技术应用于32名重症监护护士，基于与专家的共识进行交叉映射和验证。该研讨班产生了1665个诊断标签，这些标签进一步细化为120个标签。然后将它们与NANDA - I诊断标签和基本人类需求进行交叉映射过程。映射结果由两名专家护士进行内容验证，一致性率分别为92%和100%。结果发现，63个标签被列入NANDA - I，47个未被列入。
