Warth Ryan J, Rodkey William G
Center for Outcomes-based Orthopaedic Research, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A.
Center for Translational and Regenerative Medicine Research, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A..
Arthroscopy. 2015 May;31(5):927-41. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.019. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and structural outcomes after resorbable collagen meniscus scaffold implantation through a systematic review of the published literature.
A systematic search of both the PubMed and Embase databases was undertaken to identify all studies that reported clinical and/or structural outcomes after resorbable collagen meniscus scaffold implantation for the treatment of defects involving either the medial or lateral meniscus. Extracted data included study characteristics; surgical methods and rehabilitation protocols; objective outcomes; and preoperative and postoperative subjective outcome scores including Lysholm, Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee, and visual analog scale scores.
Thirteen studies were included in this review. There were 10 Level IV studies, 2 Level II studies, and 1 Level I study with follow-up intervals ranging from 3 months to 12.5 years. With a few exceptions, the study designs used in each study generally followed those which had been previously performed. Substantial differences in rehabilitation protocols and concomitant procedures were noted that may have had an effect on overall clinical outcomes. Objective findings were mostly consistent and typically showed minimal degenerative changes on postoperative radiographs, decreased signal intensity of the scaffold over time on magnetic resonance imaging, the presence of meniscus-like tissue at second-look arthroscopy, and good integration of new tissue as evidenced by histologic analysis of biopsy specimens. Most studies reported satisfactory clinical outcomes, and most patients showed substantial improvements in comparison with mean preoperative baseline values.
On the basis of this systematic review, implantation of resorbable collagen scaffolds for the treatment of meniscus defects provides satisfactory clinical and structural outcomes in most cases. There is evidence that collagen meniscus scaffold implantation provides superior clinical outcomes when compared with partial meniscectomy alone.
Level IV, systematic review of Level I, II, and IV studies.
本研究的目的是通过对已发表文献的系统评价,评估可吸收胶原半月板支架植入术后的临床和结构结局。
对PubMed和Embase数据库进行系统检索,以识别所有报告了可吸收胶原半月板支架植入治疗内侧或外侧半月板损伤后临床和/或结构结局的研究。提取的数据包括研究特征;手术方法和康复方案;客观结局;以及术前和术后主观结局评分,包括Lysholm、Tegner、国际膝关节文献委员会和视觉模拟量表评分。
本综述纳入了13项研究。其中有10项IV级研究、2项II级研究和1项I级研究,随访时间从3个月到12.5年不等。除少数例外,每项研究中使用的研究设计通常遵循先前进行的研究。注意到康复方案和伴随手术存在实质性差异,这可能对总体临床结局产生影响。客观发现大多一致,术后X线片通常显示退变改变最小,磁共振成像显示支架信号强度随时间降低,二次关节镜检查时存在半月板样组织,活检标本的组织学分析证明新组织整合良好。大多数研究报告了满意的临床结局,与术前平均基线值相比,大多数患者有显著改善。
基于本系统评价,可吸收胶原支架植入治疗半月板损伤在大多数情况下提供了满意的临床和结构结局。有证据表明,与单纯部分半月板切除术相比,胶原半月板支架植入提供了更好的临床结局。
IV级,对I级、II级和IV级研究的系统评价。