Sadatsafavi Mohsen, Lynd Larry D, De Vera Mary A, Zafari Zafar, FitzGerald J Mark
Institute for Heart and Lung Health, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Respir Med. 2015 Mar;109(3):320-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.12.014. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
Much of the evidence on the early use of inhaled controllers after severe asthma exacerbations is about their short-term benefit, leaving a gap in evidence on their longer-term outcomes.
We used administrative health data from British Columbia, Canada (2001-2012) to evaluate readmission rate (primary outcome), adherence to controller medications, and use of reliever medications associated with different inhaled controller treatments as an add-on to systemic corticosteroids (SCS) over one-year following discharge from an asthma-related admission in individuals 12-55 years of age. Exposure was assessed in the 60 days after discharge, and categorized as monotherapy with SCS (SCS-only) versus SCS plus inhaled controller therapy (SCS + inhaler); the latter was further divided into SCS + inhaled corticosteroid (SCS + ICS) and SCS + ICS and long-acting beta agonists (SCS + ICS/LABA). Propensity score-adjusted regression models were used to estimate relative rates (RR) of outcomes across exposure groups.
The final cohort included 2,272 post-discharge periods (43.0% SCS-only, 26.9% SCS + ICS, and 30.1% SCS + ICS/LABA). Readmission rate was significantly lower in the SCS + inhaler versus SCS-only (RR = 0.74 [95%CI 0.59-0.93]), but similar between SCS + ICS and SCS + ICS/LABA (RR = 0.78 [95%CI 0.59-1.04]). Long-term adherence, defined as medication possession ratio, to controller medications was 83% higher in SCS + inhaler than SCS-only, and 64% higher in SCS + ICS/LABA than in SCS + ICS. The use of reliever medications was similar across exposure groups.
Early initiation of inhaled controllers after discharge from an asthma-related hospitalization was associated with significantly better long-term adherence to controller medications as well as reduced rate of readmissions. Combination therapy with ICS/LABA seems to be at least as effective as mono-therapy with ICS in reducing the risk of readmission, with the added benefit of better long-term adherence.
关于重度哮喘发作后早期使用吸入控制器的许多证据都集中在其短期益处上,而关于其长期疗效的证据存在空白。
我们使用了加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的行政健康数据(2001 - 2012年),以评估再入院率(主要结局)、对控制药物的依从性以及与不同吸入控制器治疗相关的缓解药物使用情况,这些治疗是作为12至55岁个体因哮喘相关入院出院后一年内全身用糖皮质激素(SCS)的附加治疗。在出院后60天内评估暴露情况,并分为SCS单药治疗(仅SCS)与SCS加吸入控制器治疗(SCS + 吸入器);后者进一步分为SCS + 吸入性糖皮质激素(SCS + ICS)和SCS + ICS及长效β受体激动剂(SCS + ICS/LABA)。使用倾向评分调整回归模型来估计各暴露组结局的相对发生率(RR)。
最终队列包括2272个出院后时期(43.0%为仅SCS,26.9%为SCS + ICS,30.1%为SCS + ICS/LABA)。SCS + 吸入器组的再入院率显著低于仅SCS组(RR = 0.74 [95%CI 0.59 - 0.93]),但SCS + ICS组和SCS + ICS/LABA组之间相似(RR = 0.78 [95%CI 0.59 - 1.04])。以药物持有率定义的对控制药物的长期依从性方面,SCS + 吸入器组比仅SCS组高83%,SCS + ICS/LABA组比SCS + ICS组高64%。各暴露组缓解药物的使用情况相似。
哮喘相关住院出院后早期开始使用吸入控制器与对控制药物显著更好的长期依从性以及再入院率降低相关。ICS/LABA联合治疗在降低再入院风险方面似乎至少与ICS单药治疗一样有效,且具有更好的长期依从性这一额外益处。