Hosking Jay G, Cocker Paul J, Winstanley Catharine A
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Apr;26(4):1529-38. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu321. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
Personal success often necessitates expending greater effort for greater reward but, equally important, also requires judicious use of our limited cognitive resources (e.g., attention). Previous animal models have shown that the prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) regions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) are not involved in (physical) effort-based choice, whereas human studies have demonstrated PFC contributions to (mental) effort. Here, we utilize the rat Cognitive Effort Task (rCET) to probe PFC's role in effort-based decision making. In the rCET, animals can choose either an easy trial, where the attentional demand is low but the reward (sugar) is small or a difficult trial on which both the attentional demand and reward are greater. Temporary inactivation of PL and IL decreased all animals' willingness to expend mental effort and increased animals' distractibility; PL inactivations more substantially affected performance (i.e., attention), whereas IL inactivations increased motor impulsivity. These data imply that the PFC contributes to attentional resources, and when these resources are diminished, animals shift their choice (via other brain regions) accordingly. Thus, one novel therapeutic approach to deficits in effort expenditure may be to focus on the resources that such decision making requires, rather than the decision-making process per se.
个人的成功往往需要付出更多努力以获得更大回报,但同样重要的是,还需要明智地利用我们有限的认知资源(例如注意力)。先前的动物模型表明,前额叶皮质(PFC)的前边缘(PL)和下边缘(IL)区域不参与基于(体力)努力的选择,而人类研究已证明PFC对(脑力)努力有贡献。在这里,我们利用大鼠认知努力任务(rCET)来探究PFC在基于努力的决策中的作用。在rCET中,动物可以选择简单试验,即注意力需求低但奖励(糖)小,或者选择困难试验,即注意力需求和奖励都更大。暂时失活PL和IL会降低所有动物付出脑力努力的意愿,并增加动物的注意力分散性;PL失活对表现(即注意力)的影响更大,而IL失活会增加运动冲动性。这些数据表明PFC有助于注意力资源,当这些资源减少时,动物会相应地(通过其他脑区)改变其选择。因此,一种针对努力支出不足的新型治疗方法可能是关注这种决策所需的资源,而不是决策过程本身。