Hosking Jay G, Cocker Paul J, Winstanley Catharine A
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Jun;39(7):1558-67. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.27. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
Personal success often requires the choice to expend greater effort for larger rewards, and deficits in such effortful decision making accompany a number of illnesses including depression, schizophrenia, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Animal models have implicated brain regions such as the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in physical effort-based choice, but disentangling the unique contributions of these two regions has proven difficult, and effort demands in industrialized society are predominantly cognitive in nature. Here we utilize the rodent cognitive effort task (rCET), a modification of the five-choice serial reaction-time task, wherein animals can choose to expend greater visuospatial attention to obtain larger sucrose rewards. Temporary inactivation (via baclofen-muscimol) of BLA and ACC showed dissociable effects: BLA inactivation caused hard-working rats to 'slack off' and 'slacker' rats to work harder, whereas ACC inactivation caused all animals to reduce willingness to expend mental effort. Furthermore, BLA inactivation increased the time needed to make choices, whereas ACC inactivation increased motor impulsivity. These data illuminate unique contributions of BLA and ACC to effort-based decision making, and imply overlapping yet distinct circuitry for cognitive vs physical effort. Our understanding of effortful decision making may therefore require expanding our models beyond purely physical costs.
个人的成功往往需要选择付出更多努力以获得更大回报,而在这种需要付出努力的决策方面存在缺陷与包括抑郁症、精神分裂症和注意力缺陷多动障碍在内的多种疾病相关。动物模型表明,诸如基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)和前扣带回皮质(ACC)等脑区参与基于体力付出的选择,但要厘清这两个脑区的独特作用却很困难,而且工业化社会中的努力需求主要是认知性质的。在此,我们利用啮齿动物认知努力任务(rCET),这是对五选串行反应时任务的一种改进,在此任务中动物可以选择付出更多视觉空间注意力以获得更大蔗糖奖励。对BLA和ACC进行临时失活(通过巴氯芬 - 蝇蕈醇)显示出不同的效果:BLA失活导致努力工作的大鼠“松懈”,而“偷懒”的大鼠则更加努力工作,而ACC失活导致所有动物减少付出脑力努力的意愿。此外,BLA失活增加了做出选择所需的时间,而ACC失活增加了运动冲动性。这些数据阐明了BLA和ACC对基于努力的决策的独特作用,并暗示了认知努力与体力努力的神经回路既有重叠又有区别。因此,我们对需要付出努力的决策的理解可能需要将我们的模型扩展到纯粹的体力成本之外。