• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当忽略个体异质性时,临床试验持续时间对估计治疗效果偏差的影响。

Influence of trial duration on the bias of the estimated treatment effect in clinical trials when individual heterogeneity is ignored.

作者信息

Cécilia-Joseph Elsa, Auvert Bertran, Broët Philippe, Moreau Thierry

机构信息

Inserm U1018, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France; Faculté de Médecine, University Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.

出版信息

Biom J. 2015 May;57(3):371-83. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201400046. Epub 2015 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1002/bimj.201400046
PMID:25597640
Abstract

In randomized clinical trials where the times to event of two treatment groups are compared under a proportional hazards assumption, it has been established that omitting prognostic factors from the model entails an underestimation of the hazards ratio. Heterogeneity due to unobserved covariates in cancer patient populations is a concern since genomic investigations have revealed molecular and clinical heterogeneity in these populations. In HIV prevention trials, heterogeneity is unavoidable and has been shown to decrease the treatment effect over time. This article assesses the influence of trial duration on the bias of the estimated hazards ratio resulting from omitting covariates from the Cox analysis. The true model is defined by including an unobserved random frailty term in the individual hazard that reflects the omitted covariate. Three frailty distributions are investigated: gamma, log-normal, and binary, and the asymptotic bias of the hazards ratio estimator is calculated. We show that the attenuation of the treatment effect resulting from unobserved heterogeneity strongly increases with trial duration, especially for continuous frailties that are likely to reflect omitted covariates, as they are often encountered in practice. The possibility of interpreting the long-term decrease in treatment effects as a bias induced by heterogeneity and trial duration is illustrated by a trial in oncology where adjuvant chemotherapy in stage 1B NSCLC was investigated.

摘要

在比例风险假设下比较两个治疗组事件发生时间的随机临床试验中,已经证实,在模型中忽略预后因素会导致风险比被低估。癌症患者群体中因未观察到的协变量导致的异质性是一个问题,因为基因组研究已经揭示了这些群体中的分子和临床异质性。在艾滋病预防试验中,异质性不可避免,并且已证明会随着时间的推移降低治疗效果。本文评估了试验持续时间对因在Cox分析中忽略协变量而导致的估计风险比偏差的影响。真实模型通过在个体风险中纳入一个反映被忽略协变量的未观察到的随机脆弱项来定义。研究了三种脆弱分布:伽马分布、对数正态分布和二元分布,并计算了风险比估计量的渐近偏差。我们表明,未观察到的异质性导致的治疗效果衰减会随着试验持续时间大幅增加,特别是对于可能反映被忽略协变量的连续脆弱性情况,因为它们在实际中经常遇到。在一项肿瘤学试验中,对IB期非小细胞肺癌辅助化疗进行了研究,这说明了将治疗效果的长期下降解释为由异质性和试验持续时间引起的偏差的可能性。

相似文献

1
Influence of trial duration on the bias of the estimated treatment effect in clinical trials when individual heterogeneity is ignored.当忽略个体异质性时,临床试验持续时间对估计治疗效果偏差的影响。
Biom J. 2015 May;57(3):371-83. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201400046. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
2
Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials of chemotherapy plus cetuximab as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.随机试验中化疗联合西妥昔单抗一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
Lung Cancer. 2014 Feb;83(2):211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
3
Prognostic score for second-line chemotherapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: external validation in a phase III trial comparing vinflunine with docetaxel.晚期非小细胞肺癌二线化疗的预后评分:比较长春氟宁与多西他赛的 III 期试验的外部验证。
Lung Cancer. 2012 Jul;77(1):116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.01.013. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
4
Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of recurrent adverse events in the presence of non-proportional hazards and unobserved heterogeneity: a simulation study.存在非比例风险和未观察到的异质性时分析复发不良事件的统计方法比较:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 20;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01475-8.
5
No study left behind: a network meta-analysis in non-small-cell lung cancer demonstrating the importance of considering all relevant data.不漏掉任何一项研究:一项非小细胞肺癌的网络荟萃分析表明考虑所有相关数据的重要性。
Value Health. 2009 Sep;12(6):996-1003. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00541.x. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
6
The type I error and power of non-parametric logrank and Wilcoxon tests with adjustment for covariates--a simulation study.用于协变量调整的非参数对数秩检验和威尔科克森检验的I型错误率及检验效能——一项模拟研究
Stat Med. 2008 Dec 10;27(28):5850-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.3406.
7
Unobserved covariates in the two-sample comparison of survival times: a maximum efficiency robust test.生存时间两样本比较中的未观察协变量:一种最大效率稳健检验。
Stat Med. 1999 Jul 30;18(14):1791-800; discussion 1801. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990730)18:14<1791::aid-sim215>3.0.co;2-w.
8
Bias and sensitivity analysis when estimating treatment effects from the cox model with omitted covariates.在使用含遗漏协变量的Cox模型估计治疗效果时的偏倚和敏感性分析。
Biometrics. 2013 Dec;69(4):850-60. doi: 10.1111/biom.12096. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
9
Effects of unmeasured heterogeneity in the linear transformation model for censored data.删失数据线性变换模型中未测异质性的影响。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2006 Jun;12(2):191-203. doi: 10.1007/s10985-006-9008-y. Epub 2006 Jul 1.
10
Asymptotic simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of binary proportions in randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验中二元比例多对一比较的渐近同时置信区间。
J Biopharm Stat. 2009;19(2):292-310. doi: 10.1080/10543400802622501.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting the hazards of hazard ratios through simulations and case studies.通过模拟和案例研究重新审视风险比的危害。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1007/s10654-025-01245-6.
2
BAGS: A Bayesian Adaptive Group Sequential Trial Design With Subgroup-Specific Survival Comparisons.BAGS:一种用于特定亚组生存比较的贝叶斯自适应组序贯试验设计
J Am Stat Assoc. 2021;116(533):322-334. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1837142. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
3
Marginal hazard ratio estimates in joint frailty models for heart failure trials.心力衰竭试验联合脆弱性模型中的边际风险比估计值。
Biom J. 2019 Nov;61(6):1385-1401. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201800133. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
4
A DAG-based comparison of interventional effect underestimation between composite endpoint and multi-state analysis in cardiovascular trials.基于有向无环图的心血管试验中复合终点与多状态分析之间干预效果低估的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jul 4;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0366-9.