Song Ji Soo, Choi Eun Jung, Kim Eun Young, Kwak Hyo Sung, Han Young Min
Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju 561-712, Korea.
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Jan-Feb;16(1):69-79. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.1.69. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
To compare the radiation dose and image quality between standard-dose CT and a low-dose CT obtained with the combined use of an attenuation-based automatic kilovoltage (kV) selection tool (CARE kV) and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) for contrast-enhanced CT examination of the liver.
We retrospectively reviewed 67 patients with chronic liver disease in whom both, standard-dose CT with 64-slice multidetector-row CT (MDCT) (protocol A), and low-dose CT with 128-slice MDCT using CARE kV and SAFIRE (protocol B) were performed. Images from protocol B during the portal phase were reconstructed using either filtered back projection or SAFIRE with 5 different iterative reconstruction (IR) strengths. We performed qualitative and quantitative analyses to select the appropriate IR strength. Reconstructed images were then qualitatively and quantitatively compared with protocol A images.
Qualitative and quantitative analysis of protocol B demonstrated that SAFIRE level 2 (S2) was most appropriate in our study. Qualitative and quantitative analysis comparing S2 images from protocol B with images from protocol A, showed overall good diagnostic confidence of S2 images despite a significant radiation dose reduction (47% dose reduction, p < 0.001).
Combined use of CARE kV and SAFIRE allowed significant reduction in radiation exposure while maintaining image quality in contrast-enhanced liver CT.
比较标准剂量CT与采用基于衰减的自动千伏(kV)选择工具(CARE kV)和正弦图确认迭代重建(SAFIRE)联合进行肝脏增强CT检查时低剂量CT的辐射剂量和图像质量。
我们回顾性分析了67例慢性肝病患者,这些患者均接受了64层多排螺旋CT(MDCT)的标准剂量CT(方案A)和使用CARE kV及SAFIRE的128层MDCT的低剂量CT(方案B)检查。门静脉期方案B的图像采用滤波反投影或具有5种不同迭代重建(IR)强度的SAFIRE进行重建。我们进行了定性和定量分析以选择合适的IR强度。然后将重建图像与方案A的图像进行定性和定量比较。
方案B的定性和定量分析表明,在我们的研究中SAFIRE级别2(S2)最为合适。将方案B的S2图像与方案A的图像进行定性和定量分析比较,结果显示尽管辐射剂量显著降低(剂量降低47%,p < 0.001),但S2图像的总体诊断可信度良好。
CARE kV和SAFIRE联合使用可在肝脏增强CT中显著减少辐射暴露,同时保持图像质量。