Solomon Justin, Marin Daniele, Roy Choudhury Kingshuk, Patel Bhavik, Samei Ehsan
From the Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Rd, Suite 302, Durham, NC 27705.
Radiology. 2017 Sep;284(3):777-787. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161736. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
Purpose To determine the effect of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction (IR) on noise, contrast, resolution, and observer-based detectability of subtle hypoattenuating liver lesions and to estimate the dose reduction potential of the IR algorithm in question. Materials and Methods This prospective, single-center, HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board. A dual-source computed tomography (CT) system was used to reconstruct CT projection data from 21 patients into six radiation dose levels (12.5%, 25%, 37.5%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) on the basis of two CT acquisitions. A series of virtual liver lesions (five per patient, 105 total, lesion-to-liver prereconstruction contrast of -15 HU, 12-mm diameter) were inserted into the raw CT projection data and images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) (B31f kernel) and sinogram-affirmed IR (SAFIRE) (I31f-5 kernel). Image noise (pixel standard deviation), lesion contrast (after reconstruction), lesion boundary sharpness (average normalized gradient at lesion boundary), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared. Next, a two-alternative forced choice perception experiment was performed (16 readers [six radiologists, 10 medical physicists]). A linear mixed-effects statistical model was used to compare detection accuracy between FBP and SAFIRE and to estimate the radiation dose reduction potential of SAFIRE. Results Compared with FBP, SAFIRE reduced noise by a mean of 53% ± 5, lesion contrast by 12% ± 4, and lesion sharpness by 13% ± 10 but increased CNR by 89% ± 19. Detection accuracy was 2% higher on average with SAFIRE than with FBP (P = .03), which translated into an estimated radiation dose reduction potential (±95% confidence interval) of 16% ± 13. Conclusion SAFIRE increases detectability at a given radiation dose (approximately 2% increase in detection accuracy) and allows for imaging at reduced radiation dose (16% ± 13), while maintaining low-contrast detectability of subtle hypoattenuating focal liver lesions. This estimated dose reduction is somewhat smaller than that suggested by past studies. RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
目的 确定辐射剂量和迭代重建(IR)对肝脏轻微低密度病变的噪声、对比度、分辨率及基于观察者的可检测性的影响,并评估所研究的IR算法的剂量降低潜力。材料与方法 本前瞻性、单中心、符合HIPAA规定的研究获机构审查委员会批准。使用双源计算机断层扫描(CT)系统,基于两次CT采集,将21例患者的CT投影数据重建为六个辐射剂量水平(12.5%、25%、37.5%、50%、75%和100%)。将一系列虚拟肝脏病变(每位患者5个,共105个,病变与肝脏重建前的对比度为-15 HU,直径12 mm)插入原始CT投影数据中,并用滤波反投影(FBP)(B31f核)和正弦图确认迭代重建(SAFIRE)(I31f-5核)重建图像。比较图像噪声(像素标准差)、病变对比度(重建后)、病变边界清晰度(病变边界处的平均归一化梯度)和对比度噪声比(CNR)。接下来,进行二选一强制选择感知实验(16名读者[6名放射科医生,10名医学物理学家])。使用线性混合效应统计模型比较FBP和SAFIRE之间的检测准确性,并评估SAFIRE的辐射剂量降低潜力。结果 与FBP相比,SAFIRE平均降低噪声53%±5,降低病变对比度12%±4,降低病变清晰度13%±10,但使CNR提高89%±19。SAFIRE的检测准确性平均比FBP高2%(P = .03),这转化为估计的辐射剂量降低潜力(±95%置信区间)为16%±13。结论 SAFIRE在给定辐射剂量下提高了可检测性(检测准确性提高约2%),并允许在降低辐射剂量(16%±13)下成像,同时保持肝脏轻微低密度局灶性病变的低对比度可检测性。该估计的剂量降低幅度略小于以往研究表明的幅度。RSNA,2017 本文有在线补充材料。