Reimer Jason F, Radvansky Gabriel A, Lorsbach Thomas C, Armendarez Joseph J
Department of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino.
Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Sep;41(5):1374-87. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000105. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
Recently, a great deal of research has demonstrated that although everyday experience is continuous in nature, it is parsed into separate events. The aim of the present study was to examine whether event structure can influence the effectiveness of cognitive control. Across 5 experiments we varied the structure of events within the AX-CPT by shifting the spatial location of cues and probes on a computer screen. When location shifts were present, a pattern of AX-CPT performance consistent with enhanced cognitive control was found. To test whether the location shift effects were caused by the presence of event boundaries per se, other aspects of the AX-CPT were manipulated, such as the color of cues and probes and the inclusion of a distractor task during the cue-probe delay. Changes in cognitive control were not found under these conditions, suggesting that the location shift effects were specifically related to the formation of separate event models. Together, these results can be accounted for by the Event Horizon Model and a representation-based theory of cognitive control, and suggest that cognitive control can be influenced by the surrounding environmental structure.
最近,大量研究表明,尽管日常经验本质上是连续的,但它会被解析为单独的事件。本研究的目的是检验事件结构是否会影响认知控制的有效性。在5个实验中,我们通过在电脑屏幕上移动线索和探测刺激的空间位置,改变了AX连续性能测试(AX-CPT)中的事件结构。当存在位置移动时,发现了一种与增强认知控制相一致的AX-CPT表现模式。为了测试位置移动效应是否由事件边界本身的存在引起,我们对AX-CPT的其他方面进行了操纵,如线索和探测刺激的颜色,以及在线索-探测刺激延迟期间加入干扰任务。在这些条件下未发现认知控制的变化,这表明位置移动效应与单独事件模型的形成具体相关。总之,这些结果可以用事件视界模型和基于表征认知控制理论来解释,并表明认知控制会受到周围环境结构的影响。