• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨水泥型或非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术?——200例患者至少11年随访的对比结果

Cemented or cementless total knee arthroplasty? - Comparative results of 200 cases at a minimum follow-up of 11 years.

作者信息

Prudhon Jean-Louis, Verdier Régis

机构信息

Centre ostéo-articulaire, 5 rue Raoul Blanchard, 38000 Grenoble, France.

Groupe Lépine, 175 rue Jacquard, CS 50307, 69727 Genay Cedex, France.

出版信息

SICOT J. 2017;3:70. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2017046. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2017046
PMID:29232186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5726856/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Since 1996 we have been using cementless fixation with hydroxyapatite (HA) coating. The purpose of this paper is to compare survivorship of a series of 100 cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) to a similar series of 100 cementless with a follow up of 11-16 years. Material methods: Both TKA are mobile bearing total knee postero-stabilized. They can be used with cement or without cement. Among 1030 New Wave TKATM implanted from 2002 to 2015 we have identified 100 cemented TKAs and 100 cementless TKAs. All these cases were primary replacement. Differences in survival probability were determined using log-rank test.

RESULTS

Survival probabilities at 11 years of follow-up were: Cemented group: 90.2% CI95% [81.9-94.8]; Cementless group: 95.4% CI95% [88.1-98.2]. Comparison between both group showed significant difference, p = 0.32.

DISCUSSION

The advantages of cementless TKA are bone stock preservation, cement debris protection and the potential to achieve biologic fixation. Cementless implants rely on a porous or roughened surface to facilitate bone formation. HA has been shown to accelerate bone integration and to decrease micro motion of the components and to increase fixation. With a survival probability of 90.2% (cemented version) and 95.4% (cementless version), this total knee prosthesis performs as intended in primary total knee arthroplasty. No statistical differences could be found between cemented and cementless implants.

摘要

引言

自1996年以来,我们一直在使用羟基磷灰石(HA)涂层的非骨水泥固定方法。本文的目的是比较100例骨水泥型全膝关节置换术(TKA)与100例类似的非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术的生存率,随访时间为11至16年。材料方法:两种TKA均为活动平台后稳定型全膝关节。它们既可以使用骨水泥,也可以不使用骨水泥。在2002年至2015年植入的1030例New Wave TKATM中,我们确定了100例骨水泥型TKA和100例非骨水泥型TKA。所有这些病例均为初次置换。使用对数秩检验确定生存概率的差异。

结果

随访11年时的生存概率为:骨水泥组:90.2%,95%置信区间[81.9 - 94.8];非骨水泥组:95.4%,95%置信区间[88.1 - 98.2]。两组之间的比较显示出显著差异,p = 0.32。

讨论

非骨水泥型TKA的优点是保留骨量、保护骨水泥碎片以及实现生物固定的潜力。非骨水泥植入物依靠多孔或粗糙的表面来促进骨形成。HA已被证明可加速骨整合、减少组件的微动并增加固定。这种全膝关节假体在初次全膝关节置换术中按预期发挥作用,骨水泥型和非骨水泥型植入物的生存率分别为90.2%(骨水泥型)和95.4%(非骨水泥型)。在骨水泥型和非骨水泥型植入物之间未发现统计学差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/5726856/f85a3274b8dd/sicotj-3-70-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/5726856/69f333972548/sicotj-3-70-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/5726856/ffd756dcdc37/sicotj-3-70-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/5726856/196fadcc7b83/sicotj-3-70-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/5726856/646535a4825a/sicotj-3-70-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/5726856/f85a3274b8dd/sicotj-3-70-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/5726856/69f333972548/sicotj-3-70-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/5726856/ffd756dcdc37/sicotj-3-70-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/5726856/196fadcc7b83/sicotj-3-70-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/5726856/646535a4825a/sicotj-3-70-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8d1/5726856/f85a3274b8dd/sicotj-3-70-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Cemented or cementless total knee arthroplasty? - Comparative results of 200 cases at a minimum follow-up of 11 years.骨水泥型或非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术?——200例患者至少11年随访的对比结果
SICOT J. 2017;3:70. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2017046. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
2
Results of Cemented vs Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Same Implant Design.骨水泥固定与非骨水泥固定初次全膝关节置换术使用相同假体的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1089-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.048. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
3
Increased Survivorship of Cementless versus Cemented TKA in the Morbidly Obese. A Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.肥胖患者中初次全膝关节置换术采用骨水泥型假体与非骨水泥型假体的生存分析:至少 5 年随访。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2):309-314. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
4
No difference in implant survivorship and clinical outcomes between full-cementless and full-cemented fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.初次全膝关节置换中,全非骨水泥固定与全骨水泥固定在假体生存率和临床结果方面无差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:312-319. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
5
Migration of a novel 3D-printed cementless versus a cemented total knee arthroplasty: two-year results of a randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis.新型 3D 打印非骨水泥与骨水泥全膝关节置换的迁移:使用放射立体分析的随机对照试验两年结果。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Aug;102-B(8):1016-1024. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2020-0054.R1.
6
Cementless Tritanium Baseplate Total Knee Arthroplasty: Survivorship and Outcomes at 5-Year Minimum Follow-Up.无骨三钛基臼垫板全膝关节置换术:5 年最低随访的生存率和结果。
J Knee Surg. 2020 Sep;33(9):862-865. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712983. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
7
Perioperative and Early Postoperative Comparison of a Modern Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty of the Same Design.相同设计的现代骨水泥型和非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术的围手术期及术后早期比较
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2151-2155. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.051. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
8
Survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses.初次全膝关节置换术中骨水泥固定与非骨水泥固定胫骨假体5年随访生存率:109例假体的对比研究
SICOT J. 2020;6:36. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2020028. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
9
Comparison of cementless and hybrid cemented total knee arthroplasty.非骨水泥型与混合型骨水泥全膝关节置换术的比较。
Orthopedics. 2013 Apr;36(4):e420-7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130327-16.
10
No difference between cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty in young patients: a review of the evidence.年轻患者中骨水泥型与非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术的差异:证据综述
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jun;25(6):1749-1756. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4519-5. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Biomechanical Loading on the Tibial Insert After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.初次全膝关节置换术后生物力学负荷对胫骨假体的影响:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 7;14(4):1043. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041043.
2
The COVID-19 pandemic caused gender-specific declines in knee surgery rates in Sweden from 2020 to 2021.2020年至2021年期间,新冠疫情导致瑞典膝关节手术率出现了性别差异下降。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Oct 3;11(4):e70030. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70030. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Survivorship and complications of cementless compared to cemented posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
How is patella height modified after total knee arthroplasty?全膝关节置换术后髌骨高度如何改变?
Int Orthop. 2018 Feb;42(2):311-316. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3539-6. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
2
Patellar height assessment in total knee arthroplasty: a new method.全膝关节置换术中髌骨高度评估:一种新方法。
Int Orthop. 2016 Dec;40(12):2527-2531. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3256-6. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
3
The effect of surface morphology on the primary fixation strength of uncemented femoral knee prosthesis: a cadaveric study.表面形态对非骨水泥型股骨膝关节假体初始固定强度的影响:一项尸体研究。
非骨水泥型与骨水泥型后稳定型全膝关节置换术的生存率及并发症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
SICOT J. 2024;10:22. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2024017. Epub 2024 May 30.
4
Cemented vs. Cementless Fixation in Primary Knee Replacement: A Narrative Review.初次膝关节置换中骨水泥固定与非骨水泥固定:一项叙述性综述
Materials (Basel). 2024 Feb 29;17(5):1136. doi: 10.3390/ma17051136.
5
Long-term clinical and radiological outcome of a cementless titanium-coated total knee arthroplasty system.一种非骨水泥钛涂层全膝关节置换系统的长期临床和影像学结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Feb;144(2):847-853. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05091-7. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
6
Highlighting the Advantages and Benefits of Non-NSAID Treatment After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cross-sectional Study.强调全膝关节置换术后非 NSAID 治疗的优势和益处:一项横断面研究。
In Vivo. 2023 Sep-Oct;37(5):2371-2380. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13342.
7
Cementless Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty: 10 Years Follow-Up.非骨水泥型活动平台全膝关节置换术:10年随访
Cureus. 2023 Apr 28;15(4):e38259. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38259. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
Patient-reported outcomes following cemented versus cementless primary total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis based on propensity score matching.基于倾向评分匹配的初次全膝关节置换术水泥固定与非水泥固定患者报告结局的比较分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Oct 27;23(1):934. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05899-1.
9
The mid-term survival of cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of the ACS mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.ACS活动平台全膝关节置换术骨水泥固定、非骨水泥固定及混合固定的中期生存率。
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Aug 22;56(10):1767-1773. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00715-3. eCollection 2022 Oct.
10
Is standard total knee arthroplasty with lateral femoral overhanging a cause of anterior knee pain? A randomized controlled trial.标准全膝关节置换术中股骨外侧悬垂是导致膝关节前方疼痛的原因吗?一项随机对照试验。
SICOT J. 2022;8:3. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2022003. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb;30(2):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.030. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
4
Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty five years. Which is better?55 岁以下患者行骨水泥型与非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术,哪种更好?
Int Orthop. 2014 Feb;38(2):297-303. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2243-4. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
5
Does the method of component fixation influence clinical outcomes after total knee replacement? A systematic literature review.组件固定方法是否会影响全膝关节置换术后的临床结果?系统文献回顾。
J Arthroplasty. 2013 May;28(5):740-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.021. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
6
Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating appears to be of benefit for implant durability of tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty.羟基磷灰石(HA)涂层似乎有利于初次全膝关节置换术中胫骨部件的植入物耐久性。
Acta Orthop. 2011 Aug;82(4):448-59. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.590762. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
7
Fixation of a trabecular metal knee arthroplasty component. A prospective randomized study.小梁金属膝关节置换组件的固定。一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(7):1578-86. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00282.
8
Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis.全膝关节置换中骨水泥型与非骨水泥型假体的生存率及临床功能:一项荟萃分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Jul;91(7):889-95. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21702.
9
A randomised controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement: 15-year survival analysis.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型压配髁全膝关节置换术的随机对照试验:15年生存率分析
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Dec;89(12):1608-14. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B12.19363.
10
Hydroxyapatite-coated tibial implants compared with cemented tibial fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial of outcomes at five years.在初次全膝关节置换术中,羟基磷灰石涂层胫骨植入物与骨水泥固定胫骨的比较。一项五年结局的随机试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Oct;89(10):2204-11. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01431.