Pelz J O, Weinreich A, Fritzsch D, Saur D
Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Neuroradiology, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Ultraschall Med. 2015 Oct;36(5):487-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1398749. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
The aim of this study was to evaluate a new method of three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) angiography of carotid vessels including 3D-US quantification of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (ICAS).
Two neurologists performed native ultrasound scans of the brain-supplying carotid arteries in 73 probands (including 22 patients with 25 cases of ICAS) using a Toshiba Aplio 500 ultrasound machine equipped with the 3 D application of Curefab CS. Additionally, 25 probands underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the neck vessels.
The mean length of the proximal ICA was 32.1 mm ± 9.8 mm & 31.3 mm ± 9.0 mm (each n = 97). The interrater reliability (intraclass correlation, ICC) was 0.75 ± 0.23 for the common carotid artery (CCA, n = 90) and 0.78 ± 0.21 (n = 92) for the ICA. The intermethod agreement between 3D-US angiography and CE-MRA was 0.67 ± 0.19 (n = 45) & 0.66 ± 0.19 (n = 44) for the CCA and 0.79 ± 0.17 (n = 47) & 0.75 ± 0.19 (n = 46) for the ICA. Quantification of ICAS applying 3D-US in comparison to 2D color-coded duplexsonography (2D-CDS) showed a moderate to good intermethod agreement both by the Bland and Altman analysis and by ICC (0.8 & 0.72; with each p < 0.001). The interrater reliability for quantification of ICAS was 0.79; p < 0.001.
Native 3D-US angiography of carotid vessels shows good interrater and intermethod agreement in comparison to CE-MRA. Together with a moderate to good intermethod and interrater agreement in the quantification of ICAS, when compared to 2D-CDS, 3D-US angiography is thus a promising complementary imaging technique for carotid artery disease.
本研究旨在评估一种新的颈动脉三维超声(3D-US)血管造影方法,包括对颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄(ICAS)进行3D-US定量分析。
两名神经科医生使用配备Curefab CS三维应用程序的东芝Aplio 500超声仪,对73名受试者(包括22例患有25处ICAS的患者)的脑供血颈动脉进行了常规超声扫描。此外,25名受试者接受了颈部血管的对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)检查。
ICA近端的平均长度为32.1 mm±9.8 mm和31.3 mm±9.0 mm(每组n = 97)。颈总动脉(CCA,n = 90)的观察者间可靠性(组内相关系数,ICC)为0.75±0.23,ICA的观察者间可靠性为0.78±0.21(n = 92)。3D-US血管造影与CE-MRA之间,CCA的方法间一致性为0.67±0.19(n = 45)和0.66±0.19(n = 44),ICA的方法间一致性为0.79±0.17(n = 47)和0.75±0.19(n = 46)。与二维彩色编码双功超声检查(2D-CDS)相比,应用3D-US对ICAS进行定量分析,无论是通过Bland和Altman分析还是通过ICC,均显示出中度至良好的方法间一致性(分别为0.8和0.72;p均<0.001)。ICAS定量分析的观察者间可靠性为0.79;p<0.001。
与CE-MRA相比,颈动脉常规3D-US血管造影显示出良好的观察者间和方法间一致性。与2D-CDS相比,3D-US血管造影在ICAS定量分析方面也具有中度至良好的方法间和观察者间一致性,因此是一种有前景的颈动脉疾病补充成像技术。