Kim Teresa, Amaria Rodabe N, Spencer Christine, Reuben Alexandre, Cooper Zachary A, Wargo Jennifer A
1 Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA ; 2 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA ; 3 Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, 4 Department of Genomic Medicine, 5 Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Cancer Biol Med. 2014 Dec;11(4):237-46. doi: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.04.002.
Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and has an incidence that is rising faster than any other solid tumor. Metastatic melanoma treatment has considerably progressed in the past five years with the introduction of targeted therapy (BRAF and MEK inhibitors) and immune checkpoint blockade (anti-CTLA4, anti-PD-1, and anti-PD-L1). However, each treatment modality has limitations. Treatment with targeted therapy has been associated with a high response rate, but with short-term responses. Conversely, treatment with immune checkpoint blockade has a lower response rate, but with long-term responses. Targeted therapy affects antitumor immunity, and synergy may exist when targeted therapy is combined with immunotherapy. This article presents a brief review of the rationale and evidence for the potential synergy between targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockade. Challenges and directions for future studies are also proposed.
黑色素瘤是最致命的皮肤癌形式,其发病率的上升速度比任何其他实体瘤都要快。在过去五年中,随着靶向治疗(BRAF和MEK抑制剂)以及免疫检查点阻断(抗CTLA4、抗PD-1和抗PD-L1)的引入,转移性黑色素瘤的治疗取得了显著进展。然而,每种治疗方式都有局限性。靶向治疗的反应率较高,但反应持续时间较短。相反,免疫检查点阻断治疗的反应率较低,但反应持续时间较长。靶向治疗会影响抗肿瘤免疫,当靶向治疗与免疫治疗联合使用时可能存在协同作用。本文简要综述了靶向治疗与免疫检查点阻断之间潜在协同作用的理论依据和证据。还提出了未来研究的挑战和方向。