Borawski Elaine A, Tufts Kimberly Adams, Trapl Erika S, Hayman Laura L, Yoder Laura D, Lovegreen Loren D
Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Nutrition, Prevention Research Center for Healthy Neighborhoods, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, 4th Floor, BioEnterprise Building, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-7069.
J Sch Health. 2015 Mar;85(3):189-96. doi: 10.1111/josh.12234.
We examined the differential impact of a well-established human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/sexually transmitted infections (STIs) curriculum, Be Proud! Be Responsible!, when taught by school nurses and health education classroom teachers within a high school curricula.
Group-randomized intervention study of 1357 ninth and tenth grade students in 10 schools. Twenty-seven facilitators (6 nurses, 21 teachers) provided programming; nurse-led classrooms were randomly assigned.
Students taught by teachers were more likely to report their instructor to be prepared, comfortable with the material, and challenged them to think about their health than students taught by a school nurse. Both groups reported significant improvements in HIV/STI/condom knowledge immediately following the intervention, compared to controls. Yet, those taught by school nurses reported significant and sustained changes (up to 12 months after intervention) in attitudes, beliefs, and efficacy, whereas those taught by health education teachers reported far fewer changes, with sustained improvement in condom knowledge only.
Both classroom teachers and school nurses are effective in conveying reproductive health information to high school students; however, teaching the technical (eg, condom use) and interpersonal (eg, negotiation) skills needed to reduce high-risk sexual behavior may require a unique set of skills and experiences that health education teachers may not typically have.
我们研究了一套成熟的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)/性传播感染(STIs)课程《要自豪!要负责!》在高中课程中由学校护士和健康教育课堂教师授课时产生的不同影响。
对10所学校的1357名九年级和十年级学生进行分组随机干预研究。27名授课人员(6名护士,21名教师)提供课程;由护士授课的班级是随机分配的。
与由学校护士授课的学生相比,由教师授课的学生更有可能表示他们的授课老师准备充分、对教学内容得心应手,并且能激发他们思考自身健康问题。与对照组相比,两组学生在干预后立即报告在HIV/性传播感染/避孕套知识方面有显著改善。然而,由学校护士授课的学生在态度、信念和效能方面报告了显著且持续的变化(干预后长达12个月),而由健康教育教师授课的学生报告的变化要少得多,仅在避孕套知识方面有持续改善。
课堂教师和学校护士在向高中生传达生殖健康信息方面都很有效;然而,教授减少高风险性行为所需的技术(如使用避孕套)和人际(如协商)技能可能需要一套独特的技能和经验,而健康教育教师通常可能不具备这些。