Chaithongwongwatthana Surasith, Yamasmit Waralak, Limpongsanurak Sompop, Lumbiganon Pisake, Tolosa Jorge E
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand, 10330.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 23;1(1):CD004903. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004903.pub4.
Approximately 450,000 children worldwide die of pneumococcal infections each year. The development of bacterial resistance to antimicrobials adds to the difficulty of treatment of diseases and emphasizes the need for a preventive approach. Newborn vaccination schedules could substantially reduce the impact of pneumococcal disease in immunized children, but do not have an effect on the morbidity and mortality of infants less than three months of age. Pneumococcal vaccination during pregnancy may be a way of preventing pneumococcal disease during the first months of life before the pneumococcal vaccine administered to the infant starts to produce protection.
To assess the effect of pneumococcal vaccination during pregnancy for preventing infant infection.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 July 2014) and reference lists of retrieved studies.
Randomized controlled trials in pregnant women comparing pneumococcal vaccine with placebo or doing nothing, or with another vaccine to prevent infant infections.
Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We contacted study authors for additional information.
Seven trials were included, but only six trials (919 participants) contributed data. There was no evidence that pneumococcal vaccination during pregnancy reduces the risk of neonatal infection (risk ratio (RR) 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 to 1.46; two trials, 241 pregnancies, low quality evidence). Although the data suggest an effect in reducing pneumococcal colonization in infants by 16 months of age (average RR 0.33; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.98; one trial, 56 pregnancies), there was no evidence of this effect in infants at two to three months of age (average RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.46 to 2.78; two trials, 146 pregnancies, low quality evidence) or by six to seven months of age (average RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.22 to 2.08; two trials, 148 pregnancies, low quality evidence). None of the trials included in this review reported neonatal death as a result of pneumococcal infection.Neonatal antibody levels were reported as geometric mean and 95% CI. There were inconsistent results between studies. Two studies showed significantly higher immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels in cord blood in the pneumococcal vaccine group when compared with the control group for all serotypes. In contrast, another trial showed no difference in neonatal antibody levels between the pneumococcal vaccine group and the control group.Maternal antibody levels were also reported as geometric mean and 95% CI. One study showed significantly higher IgG levels in maternal serum in women immunized with pneumococcal vaccine when compared with control vaccine regardless of any serotypes. Another study showed significantly higher maternal antibody levels only for serotype 14, but no evidence of an effect for other serotypes.The percentage of women with seroprotection was measured in one trial at delivery and at 12 months post-delivery. At delivery, results favored the intervention group for serotype 6 (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.69), serotype 14 (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.56) and serotype 19 (RR 2.29, 95% CI 1.89 to 2.76). There were no group differences seen at 12 months post-delivery for serotypes 6 or 14 (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12 and RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.15, respectively), but results favored the intervention group for serotype 19 (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.85).No significant difference for tenderness at the injection site between women who received pneumococcal vaccine and those who received control vaccine (average RR 3.20; 95% CI 0.32 to 31.54; two trials, 130 women).The overall quality of evidence is low for primary outcomes. Most outcomes had wide confidence intervals crossing the line of no effect, and most of the included trials had small numbers of participants and few events which led to downgrading evidence for imprecision of findings.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to assess whether pneumococcal vaccination during pregnancy could reduce infant infections.
全球每年约有45万儿童死于肺炎球菌感染。细菌对抗菌药物产生耐药性增加了疾病治疗的难度,并凸显了采取预防措施的必要性。新生儿疫苗接种计划可大幅降低免疫儿童肺炎球菌疾病的影响,但对三个月以下婴儿的发病率和死亡率没有影响。孕期接种肺炎球菌疫苗可能是在婴儿接种肺炎球菌疫苗开始产生保护作用之前预防其出生后最初几个月肺炎球菌疾病的一种方法。
评估孕期接种肺炎球菌疫苗预防婴儿感染的效果。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2014年7月31日)以及检索到的研究的参考文献列表。
将肺炎球菌疫苗与安慰剂或不进行任何处理,或与另一种预防婴儿感染的疫苗进行比较的孕妇随机对照试验。
两名综述作者独立评估试验是否纳入及偏倚风险,提取数据并检查其准确性。我们联系研究作者以获取更多信息。
纳入了7项试验,但只有6项试验(919名参与者)提供了数据。没有证据表明孕期接种肺炎球菌疫苗可降低新生儿感染风险(风险比(RR)0.66;95%置信区间(CI)0.30至1.46;两项试验,241例妊娠,低质量证据)。尽管数据表明可使16个月龄婴儿的肺炎球菌定植减少(平均RR 0.33;95%CI 0.11至0.98;一项试验,56例妊娠),但在2至3个月龄婴儿中(平均RR 1.13;95%CI 0.46至2.78;两项试验,146例妊娠,低质量证据)或6至7个月龄婴儿中(平均RR 0.67,95%CI 0.22至2.08;两项试验,148例妊娠,低质量证据)均未发现有此效果。本综述纳入的试验均未报告肺炎球菌感染导致的新生儿死亡情况。新生儿抗体水平以几何均数和95%CI报告。各研究结果不一致。两项研究显示,与对照组相比,肺炎球菌疫苗组所有血清型的脐血中免疫球蛋白G(IgG)水平均显著更高。相比之下,另一项试验显示肺炎球菌疫苗组与对照组的新生儿抗体水平无差异。
母体抗体水平也以几何均数和95%CI报告。一项研究显示,无论血清型如何,接种肺炎球菌疫苗的女性母体血清中IgG水平均显著高于接种对照疫苗的女性。另一项研究仅显示血清型14的母体抗体水平显著更高,但未发现其他血清型有此效果。
在一项试验中,在分娩时及分娩后12个月测量了具有血清保护作用的女性百分比。在分娩时,对于血清型6(RR 1.49,95%CI 1.31至1.69)、血清型14(RR 1.40,95%CI 1.25至1.56)和血清型19(RR 2.29,95%CI 1.89至2.76),结果有利于干预组。在分娩后12个月,对于血清型6或14未发现组间差异(RR分别为1.06,95%CI 1.00至1.12和RR 1.06,95%CI 0.98至1.15),但对于血清型19结果有利于干预组(RR 1.59,95%CI 1.37至1.85)。
接种肺炎球菌疫苗的女性与接种对照疫苗的女性在注射部位压痛方面无显著差异(平均RR 3.20;95%CI 0.32至31.54;两项试验,130名女性)。
主要结局的总体证据质量较低。大多数结局的置信区间较宽,跨越了无效应线,且纳入的大多数试验参与者数量较少且事件较少,这导致因研究结果不精确而使证据降级。
尚无足够证据评估孕期接种肺炎球菌疫苗是否可减少婴儿感染。