• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

母亲疫苗对母亲和婴儿有效且安全吗?随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Are maternal vaccines effective and safe for mothers and infants? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Department of Datascience and Biostatistics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012376.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012376
PMID:37899087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10619060/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Maternal vaccination is a promising strategy to reduce the burden of vaccine-preventable diseases for mothers and infants. We aimed to provide an up-to-date overview of the efficacy and safety of all available maternal vaccines.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov on 1 February 2022, for phase III and IV randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared maternal vaccination against any pathogen with placebo or no vaccination. Primary outcomes were laboratory-confirmed or clinically confirmed disease in mothers and infants. Secondary safety outcomes included intrauterine growth restriction, stillbirth, maternal death, preterm birth, congenital malformations and infant death. Random effects meta-analysis were used to calculate pooled risk ratio's (RR). Quality appraisal was performed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

Six RCTs on four maternal vaccines, influenza, tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis (Tdap), pneumococcal and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) were eligible. The overall risk of bias and certainty of evidence varied from low to high. Maternal influenza vaccination significantly reduced the number of laboratory-confirmed influenza cases (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.79, event rate 57 vs 98, 2 RCTs, n=6003, I=0%), and clinically confirmed influenza cases in mothers (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.99, event rate 418 vs 472, 2 RCTs, n=6003, I=0%), and laboratory-confirmed influenza in infants (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.85, event rate 98 vs 148, 2 RCTs, n=5883, I=0%), although this was not significant for clinically confirmed influenza in infants (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.05, event rate 1371 vs 1378, 2 RCTs, n=5883, I=0%). No efficacy data were available on maternal Tdap vaccination. Maternal pneumococcal vaccination did not reduce laboratory-confirmed and clinically confirmed middle ear disease (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.02, event rate 9 vs 18, 1 RCT, n=133 and RR 0.88 95% CI 0.69 to 1.12, event rate 42 vs 47, 1 RCT, n=133, respectively), and clinically confirmed lower-respiratory tract infection (LRTI) (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.43, event rate 18 vs 34, 1 RCT, n=70) in infants. Maternal RSV vaccination did not reduce laboratory-confirmed RSV LRTI in infants (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.01, event rate 103 vs 71, 1 RCT, n=4527). There was no evidence of a significant effect of any of the maternal vaccines on the reported safety outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The few RCTs with low event rates suggest that, depending on the type of maternal vaccine, the vaccine might effectively prevent disease and within its size does not show safety concerns in mothers and infants.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021235115.

摘要

简介

母亲接种疫苗是减少母亲和婴儿疫苗可预防疾病负担的一种有前途的策略。我们旨在提供所有现有母亲疫苗的有效性和安全性的最新概述。

方法

我们于 2022 年 2 月 1 日在 PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 上搜索了三期和四期随机对照试验 (RCT),这些试验比较了针对任何病原体的母亲疫苗接种与安慰剂或无疫苗接种。主要结局是母亲和婴儿的实验室确诊或临床确诊疾病。次要安全性结局包括宫内生长受限、死产、母亲死亡、早产、先天性畸形和婴儿死亡。使用随机效应荟萃分析计算汇总风险比 (RR)。使用 Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) 进行质量评估。

结果

四项母亲疫苗(流感、破伤风、白喉和百日咳(Tdap)、肺炎球菌和呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV))的六项 RCT 符合条件。整体偏倚风险和证据确定性从低到高不等。母亲流感疫苗接种显著降低了实验室确诊的流感病例数量(RR 0.58,95%CI 0.42 至 0.79,事件发生率 57 对 98,2 项 RCT,n=6003,I=0%)和母亲临床确诊的流感病例(RR 0.88,95%CI 0.78 至 0.99,事件发生率 418 对 472,2 项 RCT,n=6003,I=0%),以及婴儿实验室确诊的流感病例(RR 0.66,95%CI 0.52 至 0.85,事件发生率 98 对 148,2 项 RCT,n=5883,I=0%),尽管婴儿临床确诊的流感病例无显著效果(RR 0.99,95%CI 0.94 至 1.05,事件发生率 1371 对 1378,2 项 RCT,n=5883,I=0%)。没有关于母亲 Tdap 疫苗接种的疗效数据。母亲肺炎球菌疫苗接种并未降低实验室确诊和临床确诊的中耳疾病(RR 0.49,95%CI 0.24 至 1.02,事件发生率 9 对 18,1 项 RCT,n=133 和 RR 0.88 95%CI 0.69 至 1.12,事件发生率 42 对 47,1 项 RCT,n=133)和婴儿临床确诊的下呼吸道感染(LRTI)(RR 1.08,95%CI 0.82 至 1.43,事件发生率 18 对 34,1 项 RCT,n=70)。母亲 RSV 疫苗接种并未降低婴儿实验室确诊的 RSV LRTI(RR 0.75,95%CI 0.56 至 1.01,事件发生率 103 对 71,1 项 RCT,n=4527)。没有证据表明任何一种母亲疫苗对报告的安全性结局有显著影响。

结论

根据母亲疫苗的类型,低事件发生率的少数 RCT 表明,疫苗可能有效预防疾病,而且在其规模内,母亲和婴儿没有安全性问题。

前瞻性注册号

CRD42021235115。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f0/10619060/58d3b5dc373d/bmjgh-2023-012376f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f0/10619060/b624b51508a3/bmjgh-2023-012376f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f0/10619060/315abd400fa2/bmjgh-2023-012376f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f0/10619060/594c34b5026e/bmjgh-2023-012376f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f0/10619060/be0f99385fcb/bmjgh-2023-012376f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f0/10619060/58d3b5dc373d/bmjgh-2023-012376f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f0/10619060/b624b51508a3/bmjgh-2023-012376f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f0/10619060/315abd400fa2/bmjgh-2023-012376f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f0/10619060/594c34b5026e/bmjgh-2023-012376f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f0/10619060/be0f99385fcb/bmjgh-2023-012376f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f0/10619060/58d3b5dc373d/bmjgh-2023-012376f05.jpg

相似文献

1
Are maternal vaccines effective and safe for mothers and infants? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.母亲疫苗对母亲和婴儿有效且安全吗?随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012376.
2
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccination during pregnancy for improving infant outcomes.孕期接种呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗以改善婴儿结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5(5):CD015134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015134.pub2.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Impact of Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) and viral influenza vaccinations in pregnancy for improving maternal, neonatal and infant health outcomes.孕期接种B型流感嗜血杆菌(Hib)疫苗和流感病毒疫苗对改善孕产妇、新生儿及婴儿健康结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 9;2015(6):CD009982. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009982.pub2.
5
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.用于预防健康儿童流感的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD004879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub5.
6
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults.用于预防健康成年人流感的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD001269. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub6.
7
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.中断或减少呼吸道病毒传播的物理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 20;11(11):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub5.
8
Vaccines for preventing influenza in the elderly.用于预防老年人流感的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD004876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004876.pub4.
9
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
10
The effectiveness of influenza vaccination in pregnancy in relation to child health outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.流感疫苗接种在妊娠期间对儿童健康结局的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Vaccine. 2020 Feb 11;38(7):1601-1613. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.056. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Perceived Adverse Events After COVID-19 Vaccination Between Pregnant and NonPregnant Women Using Two Cohort Studies in the Netherlands.在荷兰进行的两项队列研究中,孕妇与非孕妇接种新冠疫苗后不良事件感知情况的比较。
Birth Defects Res. 2025 Jun;117(6):e2490. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2490.
2
Maternal Immunization: Current Evidence, Progress, and Challenges.母体免疫:当前证据、进展与挑战
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Apr 24;13(5):450. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050450.
3
Vaccination in pregnancy.孕期接种疫苗

本文引用的文献

1
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccination during pregnancy for improving infant outcomes.孕期接种呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗以改善婴儿结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5(5):CD015134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015134.pub2.
2
Respiratory syncytial virus prevention within reach: the vaccine and monoclonal antibody landscape.呼吸道合胞病毒预防近在咫尺:疫苗和单克隆抗体领域。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Jan;23(1):e2-e21. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00291-2. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and perinatal outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy.
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Jan 13;5:1523117. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1523117. eCollection 2024.
4
[Prevention of infectious diseases. Update on PAPPS 2024 vaccines].[传染病的预防。2024年PAPPS疫苗的最新情况]
Aten Primaria. 2024 Nov;56 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):103129. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103129.
5
Use of the Abrysvo Vaccine in Pregnancy to Prevent Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Infants: A Review.在孕期使用Abrysvo疫苗预防婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒感染:一项综述
Cureus. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):e68349. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68349. eCollection 2024 Aug.
系统评价和荟萃分析 COVID-19 疫苗接种在妊娠中的有效性和围产期结局。
Nat Commun. 2022 May 10;13(1):2414. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30052-w.
4
Effectiveness of Maternal Vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine During Pregnancy Against COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization in Infants Aged <6 Months - 17 States, July 2021-January 2022.mRNA 新冠疫苗在妊娠期间对 6 月龄以下婴儿的 COVID-19 相关住院的有效性-17 个州,2021 年 7 月-2022 年 1 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Feb 18;71(7):264-270. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7107e3.
5
Severe COVID-19 in pregnancy is almost exclusively limited to unvaccinated women - time for policies to change.妊娠期重症 COVID-19 几乎仅局限于未接种疫苗的女性——是时候改变政策了。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Feb;13:100313. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100313. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
6
Maternal vaccination: a review of current evidence and recommendations.母亲接种疫苗:当前证据和建议的综述。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;226(4):459-474. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.041. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Vaccines - safety in pregnancy.疫苗接种 - 妊娠期安全性。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Oct;76:23-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
9
Impact of maternal diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccination on pertussis booster immune responses in toddlers: Follow-up of a randomized trial.母亲接种白喉-破伤风-无细胞百日咳疫苗对幼儿百日咳加强免疫反应的影响:一项随机试验的随访。
Vaccine. 2021 Mar 12;39(11):1598-1608. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
10
Maternal Immunological Adaptation During Normal Pregnancy.正常妊娠期间的母体免疫适应性。
Front Immunol. 2020 Oct 7;11:575197. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.575197. eCollection 2020.