Suppr超能文献

给予与索取:人类婴儿主动资源转移事件的表征构建要素

Giving and taking: representational building blocks of active resource-transfer events in human infants.

作者信息

Tatone Denis, Geraci Alessandra, Csibra Gergely

机构信息

Cognitive Development Center, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.

Cognitive Development Center, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Italy.

出版信息

Cognition. 2015 Apr;137:47-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 19.

Abstract

Active resource transfer is a pervasive and distinctive feature of human sociality. We hypothesized that humans possess an action schema of giving specific for representing social interactions based on material exchange, and specified the set of necessary assumptions about giving events that this action schema should be equipped with. We tested this proposal by investigating how 12-month-old infants interpret abstract resource-transfer events. Across eight looking-time studies using a violation-of-expectation paradigm we found that infants were able to distinguish between kinematically identical giving and taking actions. Despite the surface similarity between these two actions, only giving was represented as an object-mediated social interaction. While we found no evidence that infants expected the target of a giving or taking action to reciprocate, the present results suggest that infants interpret giving as an inherently social action, which they can possibly use to map social relations via observing resource-transfer episodes.

摘要

积极的资源转移是人类社会性中普遍且独特的特征。我们假设人类拥有一种特定的给予行动模式,用于基于物质交换来表征社会互动,并明确了该行动模式应具备的关于给予事件的一系列必要假设。我们通过研究12个月大的婴儿如何解读抽象的资源转移事件来检验这一观点。在八项使用违背预期范式的注视时间研究中,我们发现婴儿能够区分运动学上相同的给予和获取动作。尽管这两种动作表面相似,但只有给予被表征为一种由物体介导的社会互动。虽然我们没有发现证据表明婴儿期望给予或获取动作的目标进行 reciprocate ,但目前的结果表明婴儿将给予解读为一种内在的社会行为,他们可能通过观察资源转移情节来利用这种行为来描绘社会关系。 (注:原文中reciprocate未翻译,可能是拼写有误,可根据实际情况修正后准确翻译)

相似文献

4
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.婴儿期朴素心理学的发展起源。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.
8
Negativity bias in infants' expectations about agents' dispositions.婴儿对主体性格期望中的消极偏向。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2018 Nov;36(4):620-633. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12246. Epub 2018 May 1.
9
Infants' use of social partnerships to predict behavior.婴儿利用社会关系来预测行为。
Dev Sci. 2015 Nov;18(6):909-16. doi: 10.1111/desc.12267. Epub 2014 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

4
Seeing social interactions.观察社会互动。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Dec;27(12):1165-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
10
Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?主题角色:核心知识还是语言结构?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1850-1869. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01634-5.

本文引用的文献

2
A proximate perspective on reciprocal altruism.对互惠利他主义的一种近期观点。
Hum Nat. 2002 Mar;13(1):129-52. doi: 10.1007/s12110-002-1017-2.
3
The Co-evolution of Concepts and Motivation.概念与动机的共同演化
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014 Apr 1;23(2):115-120. doi: 10.1177/0963721414521631.
4
Interspecies object exchange: Bartering in apes?跨物种物品交换:猿类中的以物易物?
Behav Processes. 1998 Feb;42(2-3):177-87. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00075-2.
5
The emergence of contingent reciprocity in young children.幼儿偶然互惠的出现。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Oct;116(2):338-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
6
Do infants detect indirect reciprocity?婴儿能察觉到间接互惠吗?
Cognition. 2013 Oct;129(1):102-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
9
The nature of goal-directed action representations in infancy.婴儿期目标导向动作表征的本质。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2012;43:351-87. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397919-3.00013-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验