Qu Weina, Ge Yan, Xiong Yuexin, Carciofo Richard, Zhao Wenguo, Zhang Kan
Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 23;10(1):e0116717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116717. eCollection 2015.
Individual differences in morningness-eveningness preference may influence susceptibility and response to sleepiness. These differences could influence driving performance, but the influence of morningness-eveningness preference on driving behavior and accident risk has not been comprehensively studied. As morningness-eveningness preference is associated with personality characteristics, we also investigated how the interaction between morningness-eveningness preference and personality may be related to dangerous driving behaviors. Two hundred and ninety five drivers completed the reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire, the Dula Dangerous Driving Index, and personality scales for agreeableness, conscientiousness and neuroticism, and reported demographic information (gender, age, level of education, driving years and annual average driving mileage) and self-reported traffic violations (accidents, penalty points and fines). The results showed that more Risky Driving, Aggressive Driving, Negative Cognitive/Emotional Driving and Drunk Driving, as measured by the Dula Dangerous Driving Index, were all significantly correlated with more eveningness, corresponding to lower scores on the reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire. Moreover, eveningness was correlated with self-reported traffic accidents, penalty points and fines. Furthermore, a moderation effect was found: eveningness was more strongly associated with risky driving and negative emotional driving in those who scored high for trait agreeableness.
晨型-夜型偏好的个体差异可能会影响对困倦的易感性和反应。这些差异可能会影响驾驶表现,但晨型-夜型偏好对驾驶行为和事故风险的影响尚未得到全面研究。由于晨型-夜型偏好与人格特征相关,我们还研究了晨型-夜型偏好与人格之间的相互作用如何与危险驾驶行为相关。295名驾驶员完成了简化版的晨型-夜型问卷、杜拉危险驾驶指数以及关于宜人性、尽责性和神经质的人格量表,并报告了人口统计学信息(性别、年龄、教育程度、驾驶年限和年平均驾驶里程)以及自我报告的交通违规情况(事故、扣分和罚款)。结果表明,根据杜拉危险驾驶指数衡量,更多的危险驾驶、攻击性驾驶、消极认知/情绪驾驶和酒后驾驶都与更强的夜型性显著相关,这对应于简化版晨型-夜型问卷上的较低分数。此外,夜型性与自我报告的交通事故、扣分和罚款相关。此外,还发现了一种调节效应:在宜人性特质得分高的人群中,夜型性与危险驾驶和消极情绪驾驶的关联更强。