Suppr超能文献

在办公室工作的农村男性与从事农业工作的农村男性久坐行为的比较。

Comparison of sedentary behaviours among rural men working in offices and on farms.

作者信息

Pontt Johanna L, Rowlands Alex V, Dollman James

机构信息

Exercise for Health and Human Performance Group, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Aust J Rural Health. 2015 Apr;23(2):74-9. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12143. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare objectively measured sedentary behaviours among rural Australian men working in desk-based offices and on farms during work hours and across the total day.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational.

SETTING

The Riverland, South Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants in this study include 29 farmers and 29 office workers (age 30-65 years).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Objectively measured sedentary time (number and length of sedentary bouts) and steps taken, at work and across the total day.

RESULTS

During work time, office workers were significantly more sedentary than farmers (6.6 ± 1.5 hours (mean ± SD) versus 4.3 ± 1.5 hours, P < 0.05), while breaks in sedentary behaviour among office workers were less frequent (45 ± 17 versus 49 ± 17 per day, P < 0.05) and briefer (4.7 ± 6.8 min versus 9.7 ± 6.8 min, P < 0.05). Across the total day, office workers were more sedentary than farmers (10.0 ± 1.6 hours versus 8.1 ± 1.6 hours, P < 0.05). Office workers took fewer steps at work (427 ± 282 versus 882 ± 282 steps hour(-1) , P < 0.05) and across the whole day (8602 ± 3486 versus 11 579 ± 3486 steps day(-1) , P < 0.05) than farmers.

CONCLUSION

In this study, farmers were less sedentary than rural men of similar age who work in offices. Further research is needed to identify reasons for the particularly high prevalence of chronic disease in Australian farmers.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在客观比较澳大利亚农村从事办公室文职工作的男性与从事农场工作的男性在工作时间以及全天的久坐行为。

设计

横断面观察研究。

地点

南澳大利亚州的里弗兰地区。

参与者

本研究的参与者包括29名农民和29名办公室职员(年龄30 - 65岁)。

主要观察指标

客观测量的久坐时间(久坐时段的数量和时长)以及在工作时和全天的步数。

结果

在工作时间,办公室职员的久坐时间显著长于农民(6.6 ± 1.5小时(均值±标准差)对4.3 ± 1.5小时,P < 0.05),而办公室职员久坐行为的中断频率更低(每天45 ± 17次对49 ± 17次,P < 0.05)且持续时间更短(4.7 ± 6.8分钟对9.7 ± 6.8分钟,P < 0.05)。在全天中,办公室职员比农民久坐时间更长(10.0 ± 1.6小时对8.1 ± 1.6小时,P < 0.05)。办公室职员在工作时(每小时427 ± 282步对882 ± 282步,P < 0.05)和全天(每天8602 ± )比农民少。

结论

在本研究中,农民的久坐时间少于从事办公室工作的同龄农村男性。需要进一步研究以确定澳大利亚农民慢性病患病率特别高的原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验